Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Botswana

✪ Strengthening primary care facility management: a systematic review of management interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes in six sub-Saharan African countries

Authors:

Ermyas Birru, Sandra Urusaro, Aneth Dinis, Stélio Tembe, Teresa Jewell, Steve Gloyd, Kenneth Sherr, & Lisa R. Hirschhorn

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: July 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Primary Care

Abstract:

Background

Although primary health care (PHC) is central to health system performance, effective facility-level management is a critical determinant of service quality, resource use, and improved health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence on interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes aimed at strengthening PHC facility management in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review using thematic synthesis. Eight electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published between 2012 and 2022, focusing on interventions targeting PHC facility management in SSA. Implementation strategies were mapped to the thematic cluster areas of the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Implementation outcomes were classified using Proctor’s Implementation Outcome Framework, and management effectiveness domains were identified through thematic analysis.

Results

Of 3,752 studies screened, nine met the inclusion criteria. These studies represented six SSA countries: Botswana, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia. Four categories of intervention were identified: (1) training and capacity building programs, (2) peer-to-peer learning, (3) audit and feedback-based quality management systems, and (4) supportive supervision. These interventions were delivered through multiple implementation strategies, including training and education, coaching and mentoring, learning collaboratives, interactive continuous learning, and routine data monitoring. Acceptability was the most consistently reported implementation outcome. Improvements in management effectiveness were identified across four domains: financial management, organizational climate and culture, resource management and utilization, and human resource management. Five studies also reported intermediate service-level outcomes including improvements in maternal and child health indicators.

Conclusion

Interventions aimed at strengthening PHC facility management in SSA primarily emphasize skill development, collaboration, and ongoing managerial support, typically delivered through multiple strategies. However, few studies have evaluated these interventions using rigorous experimental or pragmatic study designs. More robust implementation research is needed to identify effective strategies for strengthening PHC facility management and supporting the consistent implementation of national PHC guidelines.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Identifying challenges and recommendations for advancing global mental health implementation research: A key informant study of the National Institute of Mental Health Scale-Up Hubs

Authors:

John A.Naslund, Jasmine Kalha, Juliana L. Restivo, Ishmael Amarreh, Tamora Callands, Hongtu Chen, Carlos Gomez-Restrepo, Hesham M. Hamoda, Arjun Kapoor, Sue Levkoff, Jones Masiye, Maria A. Oquendo, Vikram Patel, Inge Petersen, Ozge Sensoy Bahar, Laura Shields-Zeeman, Fred M. Ssewamala, Deepak Tugnawat, José Miguel Uribe-Restrepo, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Bradley H. Wagenaar, Milton L.Wainberg, Larry Wissow, Haja Ramatulai Wurie, Chifundo Zimba, & Soumitra Pathare

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: January 2021

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Asian Journal of Psychiatry

✪ Implementation science and stigma reduction interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Authors:

Christopher G. Kemp, Brooke A. Jarrett, Churl-Su Kwon, Lanxin Song, Nathalie Jetté, Jaime C. Sapag, Judith Bass, Laura Murray, Deepa Rao & Stefan Baral

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2019

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Medicine

Abstract:

Background

Interventions to alleviate stigma are demonstrating effectiveness across a range of conditions, though few move beyond the pilot phase, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Implementation science offers tools to study complex interventions, understand barriers to implementation, and generate evidence of affordability, scalability, and sustainability. Such evidence could be used to convince policy-makers and donors to invest in implementation. However, the utility of implementation research depends on its rigor and replicability. Our objectives were to systematically review implementation studies of health-related stigma reduction interventions in LMICs and critically assess the reporting of implementation outcomes and intervention descriptions.

Methods

PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for evaluations of stigma reduction interventions in LMICs reporting at least one implementation outcome. Study- and intervention-level characteristics were abstracted. The quality of reporting of implementation outcomes was assessed using a five-item rubric, and the comprehensiveness of intervention description and specification was assessed using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR).

Results

A total of 35 eligible studies published between 2003 and 2017 were identified; of these, 20 (57%) used qualitative methods, 32 (91%) were type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies, and 29 (83%) were evaluations of once-off or pilot implementations. No studies adopted a formal theoretical framework for implementation research. Acceptability (20, 57%) and feasibility (14, 40%) were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. The quality of reporting of implementation outcomes was low. The 35 studies evaluated 29 different interventions, of which 18 (62%) were implemented across sub-Saharan Africa, 20 (69%) focused on stigma related to HIV/AIDS, and 28 (97%) used information or education to reduce stigma. Intervention specification and description was uneven.

Conclusion

Implementation science could support the dissemination of stigma reduction interventions in LMICs, though usage to date has been limited. Theoretical frameworks and validated measures have not been used, key implementation outcomes like cost and sustainability have rarely been assessed, and intervention processes have not been presented in detail. Adapted frameworks, new measures, and increased LMIC-based implementation research capacity could promote the rigor of future stigma implementation research, helping the field deliver on the promise of stigma reduction interventions worldwide.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

BACK TO THE LIBRARY