Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Appropriateness

✪ Strategies to improve healthcare team communication structure and quality in resource-variable childhood cancer hospitals (TeamTalk): a study protocol

Authors:

Asya Agulnik, Dylan E. Graetz, Bobbi J. Carothers, Jocelyn Rivera, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Samantha Hayes, Veronica L. Chaitan, Leopoldo Cabassa, Charles W. Goss, Douglas A. Luke & Sara Malone

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: November 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communication

Abstract:

Background

Healthcare team communication is essential to high-quality childhood cancer care, especially during high-acuity events such as clinical deterioration and in resource-variable settings, where supportive interventions to resolve deterioration are less available. Communication quality has traditionally been understudied in these settings, and there is a notable lack of communication interventions that are appropriate and feasible in settings across resource levels. We propose addressing this challenge in this study protocol, which will co-develop and pilot a multi-level intervention to improve communication and outcomes for children receiving cancer treatment.

Methods/design

This study leverages systems and implementation science methodologies to evaluate and improve communication quality in the care of hospitalized children with cancer. We will use a newly developed reliable and multilingual measure of communication quality during clinical deterioration (CritCom). In this study, we will: 1) evaluate the relationship between healthcare team communication structures (using social network analysis) and quality (using CritCom) in the care of children with cancer, with a specific focus on the impact of hierarchy and modifiable communication determinants. We will then: 2) co-develop a multilevel intervention to address challenges in communication quality across variably resourced settings, using semi-structured interviews among clinicians working in these settings and intervention mapping with a global expert panel. Finally, we will 3) test the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and preliminary efficacy of this novel intervention using a cluster-randomized wait list control pilot trial in eight resource-variable hospitals providing childhood cancer care with poor team communication quality.

Discussion

This project identifies modifiable determinants of communication before co-developing and testing interventions with clinicians. When completed, this study will produce an evidence-informed, multilevel intervention to improve healthcare team communication during clinical deterioration, advancing the science of team communication during cancer care, and ultimately improving survival for children with cancer.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

From Tanzania to Washington, DC: Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and ADAPT-ITT Model to Guide the Development of a Community-Based PrEP Intervention for Black Adults

Authors:

Waimar Tun, Jennifer Gomez-Berrospi, Samuel Janson, Demarc Hickson, Christian Morris, Julie Pulerwitz, Mamaswatsi Kopeka, Jesse Yao, Rikiyah Mixson, Amanda McHale, Rachel Macey, Christian Buchanan, Bukola Rinola, Naana Koranteng-Yorke, Deanna Kerrigan, Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu, Donaldson F. Conserve & BRIDGE Research Team

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal AIDS and Behavior

✪ Implementing Social Media Strategies in Community-Partnered HIV Research: Practical Considerations From 3 Ongoing Studies

Authors:

Elena P Rosenberg-Carlson, Tamra B Loeb, Raquel G Hernandez, Jane J Lee, Aima A Ahonkhai, Jessica M Perkins, Chunqing Lin, Sung-Jae Lee, Sharon Hurt, Luke Johnsen & Alison B Hamilton.

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: September 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal JMIR Public Health Surveillance

Abstract:

Background

In recent years, social media has emerged as a pivotal tool in implementation science efforts to address the HIV epidemic. Engaging community partners is essential to ensure the successful and equitable implementation of social media strategies. There is a notable lack of scholarship addressing the operational considerations for studies using social media strategies in community-partnered HIV research. This article seeks to bridge this gap by consolidating field notes and practical considerations derived from 3 ongoing NIH-supported studies focused on Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States.

Objective

This article aims to inform the design, planning, and implementation of operationally effective community-partnered social media strategies in HIV research, ultimately contributing to enhancements in HIV practice and improved outcomes across the HIV prevention and care continua.

Methods

Supported by the University of California, Los Angeles Rapid, Rigorous, Relevant (3R) Implementation Science Hub, the 3 Ending the HIV Epidemic projects convened to form the community-partnered social media campaigns working group. The working group used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to help identify and organize key barriers and facilitators of relevance to implementation of the projects’ social media strategies. Given the high degree of interrelatedness across reported factors, the working group thematically synthesized the content into 5 practical considerations to inform use of community-partnered social media strategies in HIV research.

Results

The practical considerations identified by the community-partnered social media campaigns working group include the following: (1) the power and pitfalls of social media platforms (ie, opportunities and challenges inherent to social media platforms that may affect use of social media strategies in HIV research), (2) messengers and messages matter (ie, ensuring the appropriateness, acceptability, and quality of social media messengers and content), (3) the significance of the sociopolitical environment (ie, characterizing the sociopolitical environment surrounding HIV and its potential impact on implementing social media strategies to reach priority populations), (4) investing in academic-community partnerships (ie, cultivating positive and productive academic-community partnerships to support implementation of social media strategies in HIV research), and (5) the alignment of the institutional environment and research approach (ie, assessing and working to address features of institutional environments that may impact implementation of social media strategies in community-partnered HIV research).

Conclusion

As use of social media in HIV research and practice continues to grow, the practical considerations presented in this paper can help research teams anticipate factors that may impact implementation of community-partnered social media strategies and take early action to mitigate potential challenges. By understanding and addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of social media in community-partnered HIV research, we can leverage these platforms to accelerate progress toward ending the HIV epidemic.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Optimizing healthcare for blood donors at risk of transfusion-transmissible infections: pre-implementation mixed methods protocol

Authors:

Juan Macalupu, Elsa González-Lagos, Sarah Gimbel, & Eduardo Gotuzzo

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: August 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Global Health Action

Abstract:

In the Peruvian Amazon, a significant proportion of replacement blood donors test reactive for HIV, HTLV-1/2, and other transfusion-transmissible infections but often receive no subsequent care. Optimizing healthcare for these individuals can mitigate adverse outcomes by enabling early diagnosis and management. Effective coordination between Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services is essential to provide comprehensive care. To address this challenge, this study applies an Implementation Science approach to design and assess an innovation that enhances healthcare for blood donors affected by transfusion-transmissible infections. A pre-implementation mixed methods study will be conducted at two hospitals in the Peruvian Amazon, employing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a systems engineering tool (mapping). The study will focus on the inner setting domain of CFIR and map the care continuum to identify contextual determinants that may influence implementation. It has three specific aims planned for the future: first, to use a convergent mixed methods approach to examine the care continuum of blood donors and the inner settings; second, to co-design an innovation through qualitative and participatory methods, integrating Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services via the hospital information management system; and third, to evaluate the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of the co-designed innovation through a pilot. Replacement blood donation and fragmented healthcare systems are common challenges in other low- and middle-income countries. The findings of this study can inform future implementation research and policy in similar settings.

Paper context

Main findings: This study will co-design and pilot an innovation to improve how blood donors at risk of transfusion-transmissible infections receive screening results, confirmatory testing, and care, by integrating Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services through digital tools.

Added knowledge: This study employs a participatory, mixed-methods implementation science approach to systematically assess and address gaps in blood donor healthcare, providing a scalable methodology while ensuring context-specific, actionable interventions for resource-limited settings.

Global health impact for policy and action: This study will drive digital innovations in blood donor healthcare to strengthen blood safety and infectious disease control, while framing a pragmatic, adaptable approach for integrating fragmented healthcare systems in resource-limited settings.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

“It makes all the sense in the world”: A qualitative evaluation of patient perspectives on implementation outcomes of a peer-facilitated integrated infectious disease and substance use care model

Authors:

Annice Brown, Sharon M. Kelly, Tracy Agee, Jeffrey Hsu, Nicholas Schweizer, Geetanjali Chander, Larry W. Chang, Sheree Schwartz & Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: June 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal International Journal of Drug Policy

✪ Impact of a stakeholder selected implementation strategy package – fast tracking, provider re-training, and co-location – on PrEP implementation for pregnant women in antenatal care clinics in western Kenya

Authors:

Joseph Sila, Anjuli Dawn Wagner, Felix Abuna, Julia C Dettinger, Ben Odhiambo, Nancy Ngumbau, George Oketch, Enock Sifuna, Laurén Gómez, Sarah Hicks, Bryan J. Weiner, Grace John-Stewart & John Kinuthia

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: May 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended for HIV prevention in pregnant and postpartum women at substantial ongoing risk for HIV. In resource-limited settings, there exist gaps in the integration of PrEP into antenatal care.

Methods

We conducted a difference-in-differences analytic approach (3 months pre- and 3 months post) between January 2022 and July 2022 in 8 facilities (4 intervention and 4 comparison) in western Kenya. During the 6-month period, we tested a combination of 2 stakeholder selected implementation strategies – retraining health providers and fast tracking PrEP clients– to improve PrEP delivery. All study facilities dispensed PrEP in the Maternal and Child health clinics (MCH). We evaluated absolute changes in: PrEP penetration, PrEP fidelity, client PrEP knowledge, client satisfaction, and client waiting and service times as outcomes specified a priori while PrEP offer and HIV testing were outcomes specified post hoc. We measured acceptability and appropriateness by providers of the implementation strategies using AIM and IAM respectively.

Results

We observed statistically significant improvements in PrEP penetration and PrEP offer (p < 0.05) and non-significant improvements in fidelity. PrEP penetration increased 6 percent points (p = 0.002), PrEP offer increased nearly 6 percentage points (p = 0.002), and PrEP fidelity increased 4 percentage points (p = 0.202) in intervention vs comparison facilities. Client PrEP knowledge increased 0.45 out of 7 total points (p < 0.001) and PrEP screening increased 13 percentage points (p = 0.001). We observed no significant changes in service time (0.13-min increase; p = 0.249), waiting time (0.03-min decrease; p = 0.796), or client satisfaction (0.04/24 total point decrease; p = 0.849) in intervention vs comparison facilities. HIV testing did not significantly change (7 percentage point decrease, p = 0.305). The implementation strategy bundle was deemed appropriate and acceptable by the providers (appropriateness: 18.5/20; acceptability: 18.5/20). Overall, the implementation strategy bundle was associated with larger increases in implementation outcomes among women receiving a visit other than their first ANC visit, as well as among sites without stockouts of HIV test kits.

Conclusions

A stakeholder-selected implementation strategy bundle that included retraining healthcare workers, fast tracking PrEP clients to reduce waiting time, and PrEP dispensing in MCH improved several implementation outcomes without significantly affecting waiting time or reducing service time.

Contributions to the literature

  • Evidence is sparse on effective implementation strategies that focus on structural- and provider-level barriers to enhance delivery of integrated care in resource-limited settings.
  • Stakeholder-selected strategies are hypothesized to have a better fit to local context and potentially be more effective than externally selected strategies.
    We tested a package of two stakeholder-selected implementation strategies – retraining health providers, fast tracking PrEP clients in a difference-in-differences study in 8 clinics in Kenya.
  • The package was associated with significant improvements in PrEP penetration, PrEP offer, PrEP knowledge, and PrEP screening. It was not associated with significant changes in PrEP fidelity, HIV testing, service time, waiting time, or client satisfaction.
  • The improvement associated with the package was most pronounced among clinics that did not experience substantial stockouts of supplies, suggesting that implementation strategies are not sufficient to overcome gaps in basic resourcing in the presence of critical events.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Usability, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Collaborative Agenda-Setting Intervention (CASI) to Promote Person-Centered Ovarian Cancer Care: Development Study

Authors:

Rachel A Pozzar, James A Tulsky, Donna L Berry, Jeidy Batista, Paige Barwick, Charlotta J Lindvall, Patricia C Dykes, Michael Manni, Ursula A Matulonis, Nadine J McCleary, and Alexi A Wright

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal JMIR Cancer

Abstract:

Background

People with advanced ovarian cancer and their caregivers report unmet supportive care needs. We developed a Collaborative Agenda-Setting Intervention (CASI) to elicit patients’ and caregivers’ needs through the patient portal before a clinic visit and to communicate these needs to clinicians using the electronic health record.

Objective

We aimed to assess the usability and acceptability of the CASI and identify barriers to and facilitators of its implementation.

Methods

We recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and clinicians from the gynecologic oncology program at a comprehensive cancer center. Participants used the CASI prototype and then completed individual cognitive interviews and surveys. We assessed usability with the System Usability Scale (scores range 0‐100, scores ≥70 indicate acceptable usability) and acceptability with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (scores for both measures range from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate greater acceptability). Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using directed content analysis. Domains and constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research comprised the initial codebook. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics and compared usability and acceptability scores across patients, caregivers, and clinicians using analyses of variance.

Results

We enrolled 15 participants (5 patients, 5 caregivers, and 5 clinicians). The mean System Usability Scale score was 72 (SD 16). The mean Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Intervention Appropriateness Measure scores were 3.9 (SD 1.0) and 4.1 (SD 0.8), respectively. Participants viewed the CASI content and format positively overall. Several participants appreciated the CASI’s integration into the clinical workflow and its potential to increase attention to psychosocial concerns. Suggestions to refine the CASI included removing redundant items, simplifying item language, and adding options to request a conversation or opt out of supportive care referrals. Key barriers to implementing the CASI include its complexity and limited resources available to address patients’ and caregivers’ needs.

Conclusions

The CASI is usable and acceptable to patients with advanced ovarian cancer, caregivers, and clinicians. We identified several barriers to and facilitators of implementing the CASI. In future research, we will apply these insights to a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of comparing the CASI to usual care in a parallel group-randomized efficacy trial.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Using FRAME to characterize provider-identified adaptations to a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods approach

Authors:

Nok Chhun, Dorothy Oketch, Kawango Agot, Dorothy I. Mangale, Jacinta Badia, James Kibugi, Wenwen Jiang, Mary Kirk, Barbra A. Richardson, Pamela K. Kohler, Grace John-Stewart & Kristin Beima-Sofie

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: July 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal Journal of the International AIDS Society

Abstract:

Introduction

The Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) study is a cluster-randomized trial implemented in 24 HIV care clinics in Kenya, aimed at improving retention in care for adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV). DiSC is a multi-component intervention that assigns AYLHIV to different intensity (steps) of services according to risk. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to characterize provider-identified adaptations to the implementation of DiSC to optimize uptake and delivery, and determine the influence on implementation outcomes.

Methods

Between May and December 2022, we conducted continuous quality improvement (CQI) meetings with providers to optimize DiSC implementation at 12 intervention sites. The meetings were guided by plan-do-study-act processes to identify challenges during early phase implementation and propose targeted adaptations. Meetings were audio-recorded and analysed using FRAME to categorize the level, context and content of planned adaptations and determine if adaptations were fidelity consistent. Providers completed surveys to quantify perceptions of DiSC acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to evaluate these implementation outcomes over time.

Results

Providers participated in eight CQI meetings per facility over a 6-month period. A total of 65 adaptations were included in the analysis. The majority focused on optimizing the integration of DiSC within the clinic (83%, n = 54), and consisted of improving documentation, addressing scheduling challenges and improving clinic workflow. Primary reasons for adaptation were to align delivery with AYLHIV needs and preferences and to increase reach among AYLHIV: with reminder calls to AYLHIV, collaborating with schools to ensure AYLHIV attended clinic appointments and addressing transportation challenges. All adaptations to optimize DiSC implementation were fidelity-consistent. Provider perceptions of implementation were consistently high throughout the process, and on average, slightly improved each month for intervention acceptability (β = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.020, p = 0.016), appropriateness (β = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.027, p<0.001) and feasibility (β = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.022, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Provider-identified adaptations targeted improved integration into routine clinic practices and aimed to reduce barriers to service access unique to AYLHIV. Characterizing types of adaptations and adaptation rationale may enrich our understanding of the implementation context and improve abilities to tailor implementation strategies when scaling to new settings.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**