Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Phased Implementation

✪ A phased approach to implementing the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) in low‐income and middle‐income countries

Authors:

Diana L. Lam, Pegah Entezari, Catherine Duggan, Zeridah Muyinda, Andres Vasquez, Jorge Huayanay, Benjamin O. Anderson, & John R. Scheel

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Background

Successful breast cancer detection programs rely on standardized reporting and interpreting systems, such as the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS), to improve system performance. In low‐income and middle‐income countries, evolving diagnostic programs have insufficient resources to either fully implement BI‐RADS or to periodically evaluate the program's performance, which is a necessary component of BI‐RADS. This leads to inconsistent breast ultrasound interpretation and a failure to improve performance.

Methods

The authors applied the Breast Health Global Initiative's phased implementation strategy to implement diagnostic ultrasound and BI‐RADS within the context of a limited‐resource setting.

Results

The authors recommended starting with triage ultrasound to distinguish suspicious masses from normal breast tissue and benign masses such as cysts because the majority of health workers performing ultrasounds at this level have minimal breast imaging experience. Transitioning to full diagnostic ultrasound with condensed or full BI‐RADS should occur after performance and quality metrics have been met.

Conclusions

Transitioning through these phases across facilities likely will occur at different times, particularly in rural versus urban settings.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ The role of dissemination and implementation science in global breast cancer control programs: Frameworks, methods, and examples

Authors:

Anne F. Rositch, Karla Unger‐Saldaña, Rebecca J. DeBoer, Anne Ng’ang’a, & Bryan J. Weiner

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Global disparities in breast cancer outcomes are attributable to a sizable gap between evidence and practice in breast cancer control and management. Dissemination and implementation science (D&IS) seeks to understand how to promote the systematic uptake of evidence‐based interventions and/or practices into real‐world contexts. D&IS methods are useful for selecting strategies to implement evidence‐based interventions, adapting their implementation to new settings, and evaluating the implementation process as well as its outcomes to determine success and failure, and adjust accordingly.

Process models, explanatory theories, and evaluation frameworks are used in D&IS to develop implementation strategies, identify implementation outcomes, and design studies to evaluate these outcomes. In breast cancer control and management, research has been translated into evidence‐based, resource‐stratified guidelines by the Breast Health Global Initiative and others. D&IS should be leveraged to optimize the implementation of these guidelines, and other evidence‐based interventions, into practice across the breast cancer care continuum, from optimizing public education to promoting early detection, increasing guideline‐concordant clinical practice among providers, and analyzing and addressing barriers and facilitators in health care systems. Stakeholder engagement through processes such as co‐creation is critical.

In this article, the authors have provided a primer on the contribution of D&IS to phased implementation of global breast cancer control programs, provided 2 case examples of ongoing D&IS research projects in Tanzania, and concluded with recommendations for best practices for researchers undertaking this work.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Breast cancer treatment: A phased approach to implementation

Authors:

Miriam Mutebi, Benjamin O. Anderson, Catherine Duggan, Clement Adebamowo, Gaurav Agarwal, Zipporah Ali, Peter Bird, Jean‐Marc Bourque, Rebecca DeBoer, Luiz Henrique Gebrim, Riccardo Masetti, Shahla Masood, Manoj Menon, Gertrude Nakigudde, Anne Ng’ang’a, Nixon Niyonzima, Anne F. Rositch, Karla Unger‐Saldaña, Cynthia Villarreal‐Garza, Allison Dvaladze, Nagi S. El Saghir, Julie R. Gralow, and Alexandru Eniu

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Optimal treatment outcomes for breast cancer are dependent on a timely diagnosis followed by an organized, multidisciplinary approach to care. However, in many low‐ and middle‐income countries, effective care management pathways can be difficult to follow because of financial constraints, a lack of resources, an insufficiently trained workforce, and/or poor infrastructure. On the basis of prior work by the Breast Health Global Initiative, this article proposes a phased implementation strategy for developing sustainable approaches to enhancing patient care in limited‐resource settings by creating roadmaps that are individualized and adapted to the baseline environment.

This strategy proposes that, after a situational analysis, implementation phases begin with bolstering palliative care capacity, especially in settings where a late‐stage diagnosis is common. This is followed by strengthening the patient pathway, with consideration given to a dynamic balance between centralization of services into centers of excellence to achieve better quality and decentralization of services to increase patient access. The use of resource checklists ensures that comprehensive therapy or palliative care can be delivered safely and effectively. Episodic or continuous monitoring with established process and quality metrics facilitates ongoing assessment, which should drive continual process improvements.

A series of case studies provides a snapshot of country experiences with enhancing patient care, including the implementation of national cancer control plans in Kenya, palliative care in Romania, the introduction of a 1‐stop clinic for diagnosis in Brazil, the surgical management of breast cancer in India, and the establishment of a women's cancer center in Ghana.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**