Theories and Frameworks (General) Archives - Page 2 of 6

✪ Usability of a cross-system housing stability program for juvenile courts: A multimethod study of probation counselor perspectives

Abstract:

Background

Youth in contact with the juvenile legal system experience disproportionate rates of homelessness. While system contact is a critical intervening point, juvenile courts do not typically offer housing services. One solution is to refer youth to evidence-based, community-based services to meet housing-related needs, but a myriad of individual and organizational factors often impede court staff from making such referrals. Housing Stability for Youth in Courts (HSYNC) is a novel, cross-system service linkage model for court-involved youth facing housing instability. HSYNC was developed using codesign as a strategy to improve usability and incorporated evidence on juvenile court linkage strategies effective at increasing service referrals and improving outcomes.

Method

The current study utilized a multimethod approach to evaluate the usability of HSYNC from the perspective of juvenile probation counselors (JPCs) as one group of end-users. As part of the pilot implementation study, survey (N = 15) and semi-structured interview (N = 20) data were obtained from JPCs from four juvenile courts in one northwestern state.

Results

Survey results indicated good usability for HSYNC (mean implementation strategy usability scale score of 80). Themes from the interviews complemented survey findings, pointing to HSYNC as a value-added program that integrated well with existing probation practices. The housing navigator's approach was highlighted as a strong facilitator of program usability. Themes also provided greater insight into implementation barriers (i.e., individual and contextual factors) and areas for improvement (e.g., eligibility screening process).

Conclusions

Drivers of program usability and implications for program improvement to address identified implementation challenges to ensure the HSYNC model is effective and sustainable long-term are discussed.

Plain Language Summary

A study examining the key factors impacting successful implementation of a novel housing stability program to address homelessness risk for court-involved youth and their families.
Court-involved youth experience disproportionate rates of homelessness, yet housing services are not traditionally offered by juvenile courts. Court staff, such as probation staff, can refer youth to community-based services to meet their housing needs. Unfortunately, many factors complicate whether these referrals are made, including staff feeling overburdened by other work obligations and uncertainty about whether referring youth to community services fits within their job responsibilities. In this study, we surveyed and interviewed probation staff who were responsible for implementing a new referral-based housing stability program—Housing Stability for Youth in Courts (HSYNC)—to understand whether the program addressed previously identified barriers to referral-making. A unique feature of HSYNC is that there is a dedicated housing navigator, who works as a “linkage specialist” to support probation staff in making referrals while working directly with youth and families to access housing-related services in the community. Our findings suggest that, from the perspective of probation staff, HSYNC is considered to be a user-friendly program that is well-aligned with existing court practices. The housing navigator and their unique approach to working with probation staff, youth, and families was perceived as the strongest facilitator of implementation success; meanwhile, screening for program eligibility was the biggest barrier, pointing to the need for improvement before HSYNC is widely implemented. The persistent intersection of youth housing instability and court involvement calls for better coordination between juvenile courts and community agencies providing housing-related services. From the probation perspective, HSYNC offers a viable solution to meeting youths’ housing needs without creating additional workload burden for court staff.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS): Reflections and recommendations

Abstract:

Organizations exert influence on the implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations that are independent of the influence of organizations' individual constituents. Despite their influence, nuanced explanations of organizations' influence remain limited in implementation science. Organization theories are uniquely suited to offer insights and explain organizational influences on implementation. In this paper, we describe the efforts of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's (CPCRN) Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS) workgroup to equip implementation scientists with theory-guided understanding of organizational influences on implementation. We provide a set of recommendations for future efforts to enhance implementation through the use of organization theories and OTIS tools.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Provider Identified Access Barriers to Delivering Acupuncture to Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury and Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Self-Report Survey

✪ Applying the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies methodology to inform the redesign of a selection-quality implementation toolkit for use in schools

Abstract:

Background

Implementation strategies are key to enhancing the translation of new innovations but there is a need to systematically design and tailor strategies to match the targeted implementation context and address determinants. There are increasing methods to inform the development and tailoring of implementation strategies to maximize their usability, feasibility, and appropriateness in new settings such as the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS) approach. The aim of the current project is to apply the CWIS approach to inform the redesign of a multifaceted selection-quality implementation toolkit entitled Adoption of Curricular supports Toolkit: Systematic Measurement of Appropriateness and Readiness for Translation in Schools (ACT SMARTS) for use in middle and high schools.

Methods

We systematically applied CWIS as the second part of a community-partnered iterative redesign of ACT SMARTS for schools to evaluate the usability and inform further toolkit redesign areas. We conducted three CWIS user testing sessions with key end users of school district administrators (n = 3), school principals (n = 6), and educators (n = 6).

Results

Our CWIS application revealed that end users found ACT SMARTS acceptable and relevant but anticipate usability issues engaging in the ACT SMARTS process. Results informed the identification of eleven usability issues and corresponding redesign solutions to enhance the usability of ACT SMARTS for use in middle and high schools.

Conclusions

Results indicated the utility of CWIS in assessing implementation strategy usability in service of informing strategy modification as part of our broader redesign to improve alignment with end user, end recipient, and setting needs. Recommendations regarding the use of this participatory approach are discussed.

Contributions to the literature

The current case study adds to the nascent literature applying the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS) method as part of a larger implementation project, including one of the first independent applications outside of the CWIS method developers.
The current case study illustrates the impact and utility of the CWIS method for designing and tailoring implementation strategies.
This case study provides further guidance and recommendations for the application of CWIS to future implementation projects.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Increasing goals of care conversations in primary care: Study protocol for a cluster randomized, pragmatic, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial

Abstract:

Background

Goals of care conversations explore seriously ill patients' values to guide medical decision making and often inform decisions about life sustaining treatments. Ideally, conversations occur before a health crisis between patients and clinicians in the outpatient setting. In the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, most conversations still occur in the inpatient setting. Strategies are needed to improve implementation of outpatient, primary care goals of care conversations.

Methods

We plan a cluster randomized (clinician-level) sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patient implementation strategies on the outcome of goals of care conversation documentation when delivered in combination with clinician implementation strategies. Across three VA healthcare system sites, we will enroll primary care clinicians with low rates of goals of care conversations and their patients with serious medical illness in the top 10th percentile of risk of hospitalization or death. We will compare the effectiveness of sequences of implementation strategies and explore how patient and site factors modify implementation strategy effects. Finally, we will conduct a mixed-methods evaluation to understand implementation strategy success or failure. The design includes two key innovations: (1) strategies that target both clinicians and patients and (2) sequential strategies with increased intensity for non-responders.

Conclusion

This study aims to determine the effect of different sequences and combinations of implementation strategies on primary care documentation of goals of care conversations. Study partners, including the VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care and Office of Primary Care, can consider policies based on study findings.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Implementing evidence-based practices to improve primary care for high-risk patients: study protocol for the VA high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) type III effectiveness-implementation trial

Abstract:

Background

Patients with significant multimorbidity and other factors that make healthcare challenging to access and coordinate are at high risk for poor health outcomes. Although most (93%) of Veterans’ Health Administration (VHA) patients at high risk for hospitalization or death (“high-risk Veterans”) are primarily managed by primary care teams, few of these teams have implemented evidence-based practices (EBPs) known to improve outcomes for the high-risk patient population’s complex healthcare issues. Effective implementation strategies could increase adoption of these EBPs in primary care; however, the most effective implementation strategies to increase evidence-based care for high-risk patients are unknown.

The high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) will compare two variants of Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) strategies to implement two distinct EBPs for high-risk Veterans: individual coaching (EBQI-IC; tailored training with individual implementation sites to meet site-specific needs) versus learning collaborative (EBQI-LC; implementation sites trained in groups to encourage collaboration among sites). One EBP, Comprehensive Assessment and Care Planning (CACP), guides teams in addressing patients’ cognitive, functional, and social needs through a comprehensive care plan. The other EBP, Medication Adherence Assessment (MAA), addresses common challenges to medication adherence using a patient-centered approach.

Methods

We will recruit and randomize 16 sites to either EBQI-IC or EBQI-LC to implement one of the EBPs, chosen by the site. Each site will have a site champion (front-line staff) who will participate in 18 months of EBQI facilitation.

Analysis

We will use a mixed-methods type 3 hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation trial to test EBQI-IC versus EBQI-LC versus usual care using a Concurrent Stepped Wedge design. We will use the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework to compare and evaluate Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and costs. We will then assess the maintenance/sustainment and spread of both EBPs in primary care after the 18-month implementation period. Our primary outcome will be Reach, measured by the percentage of eligible high-risk patients who received the EBP.

Discussion

Our study will identify which implementation strategy is most effective overall, and under various contexts, accounting for unique barriers, facilitators, EBP characteristics, and adaptations. Ultimately this study will identify ways for primary care clinics and teams to choose implementation strategies that can improve care and outcomes for patients with complex healthcare needs.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05050643. Registered September 9th, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05050643

Protocol version

This protocol is Version 1.0 which was created on 6/3/2020.

Contributions to the literature

The first study to compare the effectiveness of Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) conducted individually with one site or conducted with a group of sites.
Implementation of evidence-based practices to improve care for high-risk patients in primary care.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

A tailored decision aid improves understanding of lung cancer screening in people with HIV

✪ Scaling up a brief alcohol intervention to prevent HIV infection in Vietnam: a cluster randomized, implementation trial

Authors:

Sophia M. Bartels, Huong T. T. Phan, Heidi E. Hutton, Do T. Nhan, Teerada Sripaipan, Jane S. Chen, Sarah L. Rossi, Olivia Ferguson, Ha T. T. Nong, Ngan T. K. Nguyen, Le Minh Giang, Hao T. M. Bui, Geetanjali Chander, Hojoon Sohn, Sol Kim, Ha V. Tran, Minh X. Nguyen, Byron J. Powell, Brian W. Pence, William C. Miller & Vivian F. Go

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: June 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) often address normative behaviors. If a behavior is also common among clinicians, they may be skeptical about the necessity or effectiveness of an EBI. Alternatively, clinicians’ attitudes and behaviors may be misaligned, or they may lack the knowledge and self-efficacy to deliver the EBI. Several EBIs address unhealthy alcohol use, a common and often culturally acceptable behavior. But unhealthy alcohol use may be particularly harmful to people with HIV (PWH). Here, we present an implementation trial using an experiential implementation strategy to address clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Clinicians receive the experiential intervention before they begin delivering an evidence-based brief alcohol intervention (BAI) to PWH with unhealthy alcohol use.

Methods

Design: In this hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized controlled trial, ART clinics (n = 30) will be randomized 1:1 to facilitation, a flexible strategy to address implementation barriers, or facilitation plus the experiential brief alcohol intervention (EBAI). In the EBAI arm, clinicians, irrespective of their alcohol use, will be offered the BAI as experiential learning. EBAI will address clinicians’ alcohol-related attitudes and behaviors and increase their knowledge and confidence to deliver the BAI.

Participants: ART clinic staff will be enrolled and assessed at pre-BAI training, post-BAI training, 3, 12, and 24 months. All PWH at the ART clinics who screen positive for unhealthy alcohol use will be offered the BAI. A subset of PWH (n = 810) will be enrolled and assessed at baseline, 3, and 12 months.

Outcomes: We will compare implementation outcomes (acceptability, fidelity, penetration, costs, and sustainability) and effectiveness outcomes (viral suppression and alcohol use) between the two arms. We will assess the impact of site-level characteristics on scaling-up the BAI. We will also evaluate how experiencing the BAI affected clinical staff’s alcohol use and clinic-level alcohol expectations in the EBAI arm.

Discussion

This trial contributes to implementation science by testing a novel strategy to implement a behavior change intervention in a setting in which clinicians themselves may engage in the behavior. Experiential learning may be useful to address normative and difficult to change lifestyle behaviors that contribute to chronic diseases.

Trial Registration

NCT06358885 (04/10/2024), https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06358885.

Contributions to the literature

This study tests a novel implementation strategy to educate ART providers and address their attitudes and knowledge about alcohol use and treatment in Vietnam. Few implementation strategies are grounded in an experiential approach to changing provider attitudes and behaviors in contexts where these behaviors are pervasive.
It uses mixed-methods to determine mechanisms influencing scale-up of the brief alcohol intervention (BAI) to inform future implementation of alcohol interventions for people with HIV across settings where alcohol is normalized.
It assesses resource-related costs associated with the experiential BAI (EBAI) and EBAI implementation, which can inform policymakers working to prevent HIV transmission.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Identifying Major Barriers to Home Dialysis (The IM-HOME Study): Findings From a National Survey of Patients, Care Partners, and Providers

Abstract:

Rationale & Objective

Developing strategies to improve home dialysis use requires a comprehensive understanding of barriers. We sought to identify the most important barriers to home dialysis use from the perspective of patients, care partners, and providers.

Study Design

This is a convergent parallel mixed-methods study.

Setting and Participants

We convened a 7-member advisory board of patients, care partners, and providers who collectively developed lists of major patient/care partner-perceived barriers and provider-perceived barriers to home dialysis. We used these lists to develop a survey that was distributed to patients, care partners, and providers—through the American Association of Kidney Patients and the National Kidney Foundation. The surveys asked participants to (1) rank their top 3 major barriers (quantitative) and (2) describe barriers to home dialysis (qualitative).

Analytic Approach

We compiled a list of the top 3 patient/care partner-perceived and top 3 provider-perceived barriers (quantitative). We also conducted a directed content analysis of open-ended survey responses (qualitative).

Results

There were 522 complete responses (233 providers; 289 patients/care partners). The top 3 patient/care partner-perceived barriers were fear of performing home dialysis; lack of space; and the need for home-based support. The top 3 provider-perceived barriers were poor patient education; limited mechanisms for home-based support staff, mental health, and education; and lack of experienced staff. We identified 9 themes through qualitative analysis: limited education; financial disincentives; limited resources; high burden of care; built environment/structure of care delivery that favors in-center hemodialysis; fear and isolation; perceptions of inequities in access to home dialysis; provider perspectives about patients; and patient/provider resiliency.

Limitation

This was an online survey that is subject to nonresponse bias.

Conclusions

The top 3 barriers to home dialysis for patient/care partners and providers incompletely overlap, suggesting the need for diverse strategies that simultaneously address patient-perceived barriers at home and provider-perceived barriers in the clinic.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ “A problem shared is a problem solved:” integrating human-centered design and implementation science to optimize lay counselor supervision in Western Kenya

Abstract:

Implementation science and human-centered design (HCD) offer useful frameworks and methods for considering and designing for individuals' needs and preferences when implementing new interventions or technologies in global health. When used in tandem, the two approaches may blend creative and partnered research methods with a focus on the factors necessary to design, implement, and sustain interventions. However, research is needed that describes the process of blending these two approaches and explores the experiences of community partners. This study builds from a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in Western Kenya, wherein teachers and community health volunteers have been trained to provide trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT). Mobile phones emerged as a tool to supervise lay counselors from afar; however, their use was characterized by unique challenges. Informed by human-centered design and implementation science, we first engaged lay counselors (n = 24) and supervisors (n = 3) in individual semi-structured interviews then hosted an in-person participatory workshop to “co-design” solutions to optimize the use of mobile phone supervision. Lay counselors participated in focus group discussions regarding their experiences in the workshop. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. We describe our approach as well as focus group discussion results. Counselors felt the workshop was a valuable experience to learn new strategies from their colleagues, and they enjoyed the “collaborative spirit” that emerged as they worked together. Counselors felt that varying small and large group discussions fostered participation by creating opportunities for more people to engage and share their thoughts. Counselors suggested the approach be improved by providing more tangible materials (e.g., hand-outs) and more closely following a schedule of activities. It is important to also center stakeholders’ experiences as partners in the research process. Though counselors largely expressed positive sentiments, they also shared valuable suggestions for how to improve participatory research practices in the future.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Research and Practice

Abstract:

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Plain Language Summary

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Conclusion

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Analysis

Discussion

Trial registration

Protocol version

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access CHEST Journal

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial Registration

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal American Journal of Kidney Disease

Abstract:

Rationale & Objective

Study Design

Setting and Participants

Analytic Approach

Results

Limitation

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Social Science and Medicine - Mental Health

Abstract: