UW Articles Archive - Page 12 of 60 - Implementation Science at UW

✪ Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating HIV care into cancer centers in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe

Abstract:

Background

In East and Southern Africa, treatment of people with concomitant cancer and HIV is complicated by siloed service delivery pathways, which exacerbate barriers to care and impact clinical decision-making. Integrating HIV care into cancer treatment centers may improve service delivery and overall patient outcomes.

Methods

We administered a questionnaire to clinicians and support staff at tertiary cancer referral centers in Malawi, Zimbabwe, Uganda, and South Africa to assess level of concern about clinical management of people with HIV (PWH) and cancer, barriers to integrating HIV service delivery into cancer treatment delivery, and beliefs related to HIV, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and integrated care.

Results

Of 195 clinician and support staff participants, 165 (85 %) were direct providers of cancer-associated care. Over 50 % indicated that they held concerns about survival, treatment complications, co-morbidities, and drug-drug interactions in PWH compared to patients without HIV. Over 80 % agreed that knowing cancer patients’ HIV status, ART status, and ART regimen would facilitate better care and should be considered in cancer care decision-making. Overall, respondents were optimistic that HIV-related care could be easily integrated into cancer care provision. The most-frequently endorsed barriers to integrated care were workspace limitations, disruptions to workflow, availability of staff, and cost to the hospital and to patients.

Conclusions

Cancer clinicians and support staff report overall positive attitudes toward integrating HIV and cancer service delivery. Research to elucidate service delivery pathways and contextualize system-based barriers to integrating care are critical next steps to optimize linked HIV and cancer care delivery.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Design of a pragmatic trial integrating human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling into primary care to reduce cervical cancer screening disparities in Somali American individuals: The Isbaar project

✪ Training and Support Practices and Insights in the Sustainability of mHealth Implementations in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract:

We conducted an interview-based study to understand the training and support practices and insights that influence sustainable implementations of mHealth projects of varying mHealth technologies. The qualitative assessment was inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research adapted with the recommended questions for guiding the implementation of training programs. Participants in the study (N = 16) were both international and in-country researchers managing projects in sub-Saharan Africa. We chose to focus on training and support, as it is often the interface between international and in-country components of these projects. Participants agreed on the central role of training in the implementation of mHealth projects and are following best practices. There was often a division in the responsibility of training between international and in-country researchers reflecting the distinction between project management and local implementation adaptions. One of the main findings is the importance of individualized continuous retraining to make deployments robust with respect to changing conditions with technology and personnel, an aspect that has been managed a bit differently with varying mHealth technologies as presented in this article.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Sustainability of an evidence-based intervention supporting transition to independent care for youth living with HIV in Kenya

Abstract:

Integrating and sustaining evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in routine care is crucial to improving HIV treatment outcomes among youth living with HIV (YLH). However, EBIs are often not sustained post clinical trial. An Adolescent Transition Package (ATP) delivered by health care workers (HCWs) and tested in Kenya in 2021 significantly improved YLH readiness to transition to independent care. Post-trial, participating clinics could continue using the ATP. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews with health care workers to evaluate determinants of continued ATP implementation one-year post-trial. Interviews used semi-structured guides, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research version 2.0 (CFIR v2.0). Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify key influences of ATP sustainment and fidelity post-trial. Effective training during and after the trial, and continued internal and external support for implementation, were crucial for sustained acceptability and feasibility. In contrast, staff shortages and high turnover, lack of integration into the existing electronic medical system, and maintaining staff motivation were barriers to ATP sustainment. Implementation fidelity was limited by workforce constraints and HCW beliefs about the importance of individualizing content and delivery to be responsive to individual client needs. ATP adaptability afforded optimization of delivery to overcome workforce constraints and meet client needs, increasing HCW perceptions of feasibility and motivating continued use. Alignment between observed impact and care provision goals further motivated ongoing ATP utilization. Strategies to ensure continued training and integration of tools into existing systems have the potential to further enhance ATP sustainability.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators’ use of a social engagement intervention

Abstract:

Background

Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based evidence-based peer social engagement intervention for autistic students. RR involves direct training and coaching with educators; however, educators face several barriers to implementation at both the individual- and organizational-levels. This protocol paper describes a multi-site study that will test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize educators’ use (fidelity and sustainment) of RR for autistic students and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral and may need additional support during recess.

Methods

This study will employ a hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation trial. Fifty-five elementary schools will be recruited as well as 121 educators (e.g., classroom assistants, aides), 55 general and special educator teachers, and 83–138 other school personnel (e.g., administrators). Additionally, at least 118 autistic students and allistic or non-autistic classmates will be recruited as RR recipients. Participants will complete baseline assessments at the beginning of the year, and all schools will be provided RR training. Schools will be randomized to coaching with or without school-based teams. This study will measure RR fidelity (primary outcome), RR sustainment, as well as peer engagement, social network inclusion, and social skills (secondary outcomes). It is expected that coaching with school-based teams will improve both RR fidelity and social network inclusion, while coaching with and without school-based teams will result in improved peer engagement and social skills.

Discussion

Previous research has documented barriers to RR implementation at both the individual- (provider) and organization-level (school). Using multi-level implementation strategies such as coaching with school-based teams may address these barriers and support RR implementation in schools. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to scale up tailored implementation strategies for use in public school districts, with the ultimate goal of increasing intervention access and improving student outcomes.

Trial registration

Name of the Registry: clinicaltrials.gov.
Trial Registration: Clinical Trials ID: NCT06559267.
Date of Registration: August 15, 2024. Prospectively registered.

Contributions to the literature

Remaking Recess (RR) is an intervention that improves peer engagement and classroom inclusion in autistic students. Educators, who play an important role in supporting autistic youth and their peers who are socially-isolated, rejected, or peripheral during the school day and at recess, can deliver RR.
Schools face many challenges, at both the individual- (i.e., educator) and organizational-levels (i.e., school), when implementing new interventions.
This study will evaluate the impact of two implementation strategies on the fidelity and sustainment of RR: (a) individual direct coaching for educators (coaching), and (b) supporting a team of school personnel (school-based teams) in addition to coaching.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Implementation research logic model in the design and execution of eHealth innovations for maternal and newborn healthcare in Ethiopia

Abstract:

Background

The use of eHealth innovations is becoming increasingly important in improving health outcomes, especially for maternal and newborn health. However, planning and executing these innovations can be challenging due to their complex nature. To provide guidance and clarity on implementation approaches, researchers need to use implementation research (IR) tools. We conducted IR to recognize the challenges in implementing eHealth innovations in the context of maternal and newborn healthcare using the implementation research logic model (IRLM). Therefore, this paper aims to describe the practical application of IRLM to design, execute and evaluate eHealth innovations that improve maternal and newborn care in public facilities in Ethiopia.

Methods

We employed rapid review, formative assessment and process evaluation of an eHealth innovation in selected healthcare facilities serving maternal and newborn care. The eHealth innovation we developed and deployed was named ‘ADHERE’ (Antenatal Care, ChilDbirtH CarE and Postnatal CaRE), representing the continuum of maternal care. The rapid review was conducted as an initial step using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We employed a mix of data collection methods: interview/discussion, eHealth system or document review and direct observation. Furthermore, we executed various stakeholder engagement activities: two co-creation workshops and on-site iterative discussions. We applied the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to capture ongoing implementation learnings.

Results

We developed IRLM of the eHealth innovation implementation for three contexts: urban, peri-urban and remote public healthcare facilities. The model depicted the mechanism of interaction between implementation determinants and implementation strategies to produce the intended implementation outcomes. The IRLM helped to identify more than 35 implementation barriers or facilitators for eHealth interventions and to develop over 17 mitigation strategies for the study contexts. The initial IRLM was refined through ongoing implementation learnings and the mitigation strategies that were executed.

Conclusions

The IRLM is a comprehensive and effective guiding tool for the development, implementation and evaluation of innovations in various low- and middle-income contexts. Researchers and implementing partners should adapt and use it.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Systems analysis and improvement to optimize opioid use disorder care quality and continuity for patients exiting jail (SAIA-MOUD)

Abstract:

Background

Between 2012–2022 opioid-related overdose deaths in the United States, including Washington State, have risen dramatically. Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a complex, chronic, and criminalized illness with biological, environmental, and social causes. One-fifth of people with OUD have recent criminal-legal system involvement; > 50% pass through WA jails annually.

Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) can effectively treat OUD. WA has prioritized improving access to MOUD, including for those in jails. As patients in jail settings are systematically marginalized due to incarceration, it is critical to foster connections to MOUD services upon release, an acknowledged period of high overdose risk. Currently, there is insufficient focus on developing strategies to foster linkages between jail-based MOUD and referral services.

The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA), an evidence-based implementation strategy, may optimize complex care cascades like MOUD provision and improve linkages between jail- and community-based providers. SAIA bundles systems engineering tools into an iterative process to guide care teams to visualize cascade drop-offs and prioritize steps for improvement; identify modifiable organization-level bottlenecks; and propose, implement, and evaluate modifications to overall cascade performance. The SAIA-MOUD study aims to strengthen the quality and continuity of MOUD care across jail and referral clinics in King County, WA, and ultimately reduce recidivism and mortality.

Methods

We will conduct a quasi-experimental evaluation of SAIA effectiveness on improving MOUD care cascade quality and continuity for patients receiving care in jail and exiting to referral clinics; examine determinants of SAIA-MOUD adoption, implementation, and sustainment; and determine SAIA-MOUD’s cost and cost-effectiveness. Clinic teams with study team support will deliver the SAIA-MOUD intervention at the jail-based MOUD program and three referral clinics over a two-year intensive phase, followed by a one-year sustainment phase where SAIA implementation will be led by King County Jail MOUD staff without study support to enable pragmatic evaluation of sustained implementation.

Discussion

SAIA packages user-friendly systems engineering tools to guide decision-making by front-line care providers to identify low-cost, contextually appropriate health care improvement strategies. By integrating SAIA into MOUD care provision in jail and linked services, this pragmatic trial is designed to test a model for national scale-up.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06593353 (registered 09/06/2024).

Contributions to the literature

Our study examines whether the introduction of an evidence-based, user-friendly, low-cost package of systems engineering tools can optimize investments in providing medications for opioid use disorder for individuals during the high-risk period immediately after exiting jail.
This is the first application of the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) across health system levels to optimize both care delivery and continuity of care.
Our study is designed to provide decision-makers with evidence they need to decide whether to invest in systems engineering approaches during the expansion of MOUD in jail settings, including information on acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness and cost.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Peer Review reports

✪ A Team Coaching Intervention for Dementia Care: Acceptability and Feasibility Study in Care Communities

Abstract:

Objectives

In 2018, the Alzheimer's Association published the Dementia Care Practice Recommendations (DCPR) to provide guidance on quality care for professionals. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a consultative coaching program to increase adoption of the DCPR.

Design

A single-group pre-post design was employed. A 6-month team coaching intervention was implemented to make organization-wide and measurable changes in the areas of (1) policies and procedures, (2) education and training, or (3) care practices to increase person-centered care practices.

Setting and Participants

A total of 36 care communities in Washington and Montana states were enrolled in this program.

Methods

Focus groups were conducted with participants to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the program. A 35-item employees satisfaction survey was administered both before and after the program.

Results

The findings offer preliminary evidence that implementing a coaching program is desired by care community staff and has a positive impact on staff job satisfaction and the use of person-centered care. The coaching model was received by staff as a supportive and affirming program.

Conclusions and Implications

The team coaching intervention, designed to improve person-centered care and employee satisfaction, is acceptable. However, its efficacy needs to be tested with a larger sample using a randomized controlled design.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS): Reflections and recommendations

Abstract:

Organizations exert influence on the implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations that are independent of the influence of organizations' individual constituents. Despite their influence, nuanced explanations of organizations' influence remain limited in implementation science. Organization theories are uniquely suited to offer insights and explain organizational influences on implementation. In this paper, we describe the efforts of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's (CPCRN) Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS) workgroup to equip implementation scientists with theory-guided understanding of organizational influences on implementation. We provide a set of recommendations for future efforts to enhance implementation through the use of organization theories and OTIS tools.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Formative evaluation of the implementation of digital therapeutics for opioids and other substance use disorders in primary care (DIGITS trial)

Abstract:

Background

Substance use disorders (SUDs) result in individual and societal burden. However, most individuals with SUD receive no treatment. Implementing SUD interventions in primary care could address this population's treatment needs. In the USA, reSET® and reSET-O® were the first prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) for SUDs and opioid use disorder (OUD), respectively. The Digital Treatments for Substance Use Disorder (DIGITS) study tested the effectiveness of practice facilitation and health coaching strategies to support reSET and reSET-O implementation into primary care. A formative evaluation was conducted to monitor implementation, inform adaptations, and learn what promotes PDT sustainment.

Method

The Dynamic Sustainability Framework and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies guided the evaluation. Using rapid qualitative methods, we collected and analyzed observational fieldnotes, key informant interviews, and document sources (e.g., meeting minutes) for synthesis and dissemination to clinical partners and the study team via formative reports. We analyzed the reports to generate evaluation results.

Results

Twenty-four primary care clinics participated. Evaluation data included 98 observational fieldnotes, 16 interviews, and 253 document sources. We produced nine formative reports. The study encountered barriers and facilitators in each DSF domain (ecological system, practice setting, and intervention). In the ecological system, the PDT vendor enabled the study, but the COVID-19 pandemic, laws, regulations, and contracting delayed implementation. In the practice setting, staff shortages and low clinic capacity were implementation challenges, while electronic health record capabilities were both barriers and facilitators. At the intervention level, non-routine workflows, clinician burden, and low patient engagement were barriers despite clinicians’ efforts.

Conclusions

Digital therapeutics are promising SUD and OUD treatments, but integration into primary care requires conducive laws and regulations, organizational capacity, and patient and clinician engagement. Formative evaluation identified important lessons for future PDT implementation.

Plain Language Summary

Evaluation of the integration of digital treatments for opioid and other substance use disorders in primary care

Most people with substance use disorders (SUDs) receive no treatment. In the USA, two smartphone app-based digital treatments for SUD and opioid use disorders (OUDs) became available by prescription. The Digital Treatments for Substance Use Disorder (DIGITS) study, a randomized implementation trial, tested how best to integrate these digital treatments for SUD and OUD into primary care. Throughout the study, we conducted a formative evaluation to observe progress, recommend implementation improvements, and understand how digital treatments could be offered to patients after the study ended. For this evaluation, we collected qualitative data through observing study meetings and interviewing primary care leaders, clinicians, and clinical and study staff. The data were regularly summarized and reported to our clinical partners and the study team. We used two implementation frameworks to interpret the data: the Dynamic Sustainability Framework and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies. The evaluation revealed factors that helped and hindered implementation. Obstacles from outside the health care system included the COVID-19 pandemic, laws, regulations, and delays in setting up contractual agreements, whereas a partnership with the digital treatment vendor proved helpful. Clinics had difficulties with clinician burden, staff shortages, lack of time and available appointments, and performing new and unfamiliar tasks. The electronic health record system both supported and impended implementation. Last, few patients accepted the offered digital treatment, or used it persistently. Formative evaluation results suggest that digital treatments for SUD and OUD in primary care are promising, however their successful use requires supportive laws and regulations, health system resources, and increased patient and clinician engagement.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the journal Translational Oncology

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Contemporary Clinical Trials

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal PLOS Global Public Health

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the journal Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract:

Objectives

Design

Setting and Participants

Methods

Results

Conclusions and Implications

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Research and Practice

Abstract:

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Plain Language Summary

Evaluation of the integration of digital treatments for opioid and other substance use disorders in primary care