Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Nigeria

✪ Implementation science frameworks and strategies to promote adoption of and adherence to oncology clinical practice guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Authors:

Anya Romanoff, Kathleen Lynch, Lily Martin, Olayide Agodirin, Shilpa Murthy, Olalekan Olasehinde, Chukwuma Okereke, Julia M. Jackman, Betel Yibrehu, William E. Rosa, Catherine Zivanov, Erica Mann, Joy O. Ogunmuyiwa, Colleen E. Witty, Victoria L. Mango, Olusegun Isaac Alatise, T. Peter Kingham, Rachel Vreeman, Benjamin O. Anderson & Jamie S. Ostroff

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: July 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Global Public Health

Abstract:

Background

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were developed to standardize and optimize cancer care delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this scoping review is to identify implementation science (IS) frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs.

Methods

We identified studies that describe, develop, reference, or utilize IS frameworks or strategies to deliver or evaluate adoption of oncology CPGs in LMICs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), African Journals Online, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO on 3/21/2022, 12/20/2022, 01/26/2024, and 10/03/2025. Publications in all languages and of all study types were eligible for inclusion. Titles, abstracts, and full text were screened by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Excluded studies did not use an IS framework or strategy, did not focus on cancer care, or were conducted in a high-income country.

Results

Searches identified 17,806 unique publications for title/abstract screening. 182 studies met criteria for full-text review; 35 were included. Twenty-four studies were country-specific, most commonly India (n = 5) and Nigeria (n = 5). The most frequent CPGs referenced were national/country-specific guidelines (n = 13) and Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) guidelines (n = 9). Only 16 full-text publications described original research to promote or evaluate evidence-based CPG interventions in LMICs. Established IS frameworks used in more than one study were the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework (n = 2) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (n = 2).

Conclusions

There is limited research utilizing IS frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs and substantial heterogeneity in reporting. Greater utilization of IS frameworks, strengthening implementation capacity and improving consistency in reporting, are needed to improve CPG uptake in LMICs.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nb75s).

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Health Care Professional Adherence to Breast Cancer Management Guidelines in Nigeria

Authors:

Anya Romanoff, Olalekan Olasehinde, Kathleen Lynch, Sharif Folorunso, Oluwatosin Omoyiola, Betiku Omolade, Adeleye Omisore, Chukwuma Eze Okereke, Olayide Agodirin, Abubakar Bala Muhammad, Nuhu Ali, Omorodion Irowa, Nneka Sunday Nweke, Uchechukwu Emmanuel Nwokwu, Adewale Aderounmu, Funmilola Wuraola, Hannah L Kalvin, Rivka Kahn, Grace Fitzgerald, Cristina Olcese, Alexia Iasonos, Victoria L Mango, Jamie S Ostroff, Rachel Vreeman, Benjamin O Anderson, T Peter Kingha, and Olusegun Isaac Alatise

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal JAMA Network Open

Abstract:

Importance

In Nigeria, 80% of breast cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage, when clinical management is complex and necessitates multidisciplinary collaboration. The Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health promotes multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) discussions and endorses the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Harmonized Guidelines for Sub-Saharan Africa (Harmonized Guidelines) to standardize breast cancer care, but the extent of their clinical utilization is not well understood.

Objective

To identify barriers to and facilitators of the standardization of breast cancer care in Nigeria as reflected by awareness and consultation of resource-adapted guidelines.

Design, Setting, and Participants

For this survey study, health care professionals (HCPs) involved in breast cancer care in Nigeria were recruited electronically through medical societies and snowball sampling from November 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024.

Exposure

Breast cancer care guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Current breast cancer guideline awareness, adherence among specialties, and multidisciplinary management in Nigeria were evaluated. A multinational, multidisciplinary team developed and distributed an HCP questionnaire. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and logistic regression assessed associations with guideline awareness and use.

Results

A total of 277 HCPs (median [IQR] age, 42 [38-48] years; 211 of 275 [77%] male), including 124 surgeons (45%), 59 radiologists (21%), 49 clinical oncologists (18%), and 45 pathologists (16%), responded to the survey. Of 274 HCPs, 253 (92%) believed that breast cancer guidelines contribute to better patient outcomes, and 100 of 195 (51%) routinely consulted guidelines. Of 273 HCPs, 103 (38%) had regular engagement in breast cancer MDT discussions. Only 93 of 277 HCPs (34%) were aware of resource-adapted Harmonized Guidelines; both guideline awareness and consultation increased with the frequency of MDT participation. Completing a cancer-related fellowship (OR, 14.56; 95% CI, 6.24-40.00; P < .001), clinical oncology specialization (OR vs surgery, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.09-0.42]; OR vs pathology, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.02-0.14]; OR vs radiology, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.06]; P < .001), devoting more time to breast health care delivery (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001), and regular MDT engagement (OR for weekly vs none, 5.13; 95% CI, 1.69-17.35; P = .04) were associated with consulting guidelines regularly on univariable analysis. To improve guideline adherence, 230 of 277 HCPs (83%) reported needing regular MDT discussions.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this survey of HCPs across Nigeria, half reported routinely consulting guidelines and only one-third were aware of the Harmonized Guidelines, which are resource adapted and endorsed by the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health. Approximately one-third of HCPs reported engaging in regular breast cancer MDT discussions; guideline awareness and consultation increased as frequency of MDT participation increased. Opportunities for disseminating knowledge, such as MDT discussions and fellowship training, are essential to standardize breast cancer care delivery in Nigeria.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Responding to the challenge of Adolescent Perinatal Depression (RAPiD): Protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid trial of psychosocial intervention in primary maternal care

Authors:

Oye Gureje, Lola Kola, Bibilola D. Oladeji, Jibril Abdulmalik, Olatunde Ayinde, Phyllis Zelkowitz & Ian Bennett

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Trials

Abstract:

Background

Adolescent pregnancy is a pressing public health issue globally, and particularly in low and middle-income countries. Depression occurring in the perinatal period is common among women and more so among adolescent mothers. Effective treatments for the condition have been demonstrated in adults but the needs of adolescents are often unique, making such treatments unlikely to meet those needs.

Method/study design

A hybrid effectiveness–implementation research study is described in which a cluster randomized trial design is used to explore the effectiveness as well as the utility in routine practice of an intervention package specifically designed for adolescents with perinatal depression. Consenting pregnant adolescents (aged less than 20 years) who are newly registered for antenatal care are enrolled into the trial if their fetal gestational age is less than 36 weeks and they score 12 or more on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The intervention package consists of structured sessions of behavior activation, problem-solving treatment, and parenting skills training, and is delivered by primary maternal health care providers, complemented by support provided by a “neighborhood mother” identified by the adolescent.

Mothers in the control arm receive care as usual. The trial is conducted in clinics where the maternal providers are trained to deliver routine depression care with the use of the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme, intervention guide. Assessments are undertaken by trained blinded assessors at baseline, at childbirth, and at 3 and 6 months postpartum. The primary outcome, assessed at 6 months, is the level of maternal depression (measured with the EPDS). The secondary outcome is parenting skills (assessed with the Home Observation Measurement of the Environment, Infant–Toddler version), while tertiary outcomes include measures of disability, quality of life, mother–child bonding, as well as infants’ nutritional and growth indices.

Discussion

This, to the best of our knowledge, will be the first fully-powered trial of an intervention package specifically designed to address the unique needs of adolescents with perinatal depression.

Trial registration

ISRCTN16775958. Registered on 30 April 2019.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Implementation science and stigma reduction interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Authors:

Christopher G. Kemp, Brooke A. Jarrett, Churl-Su Kwon, Lanxin Song, Nathalie Jetté, Jaime C. Sapag, Judith Bass, Laura Murray, Deepa Rao & Stefan Baral

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2019

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Medicine

Abstract:

Background

Interventions to alleviate stigma are demonstrating effectiveness across a range of conditions, though few move beyond the pilot phase, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Implementation science offers tools to study complex interventions, understand barriers to implementation, and generate evidence of affordability, scalability, and sustainability. Such evidence could be used to convince policy-makers and donors to invest in implementation. However, the utility of implementation research depends on its rigor and replicability. Our objectives were to systematically review implementation studies of health-related stigma reduction interventions in LMICs and critically assess the reporting of implementation outcomes and intervention descriptions.

Methods

PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for evaluations of stigma reduction interventions in LMICs reporting at least one implementation outcome. Study- and intervention-level characteristics were abstracted. The quality of reporting of implementation outcomes was assessed using a five-item rubric, and the comprehensiveness of intervention description and specification was assessed using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR).

Results

A total of 35 eligible studies published between 2003 and 2017 were identified; of these, 20 (57%) used qualitative methods, 32 (91%) were type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies, and 29 (83%) were evaluations of once-off or pilot implementations. No studies adopted a formal theoretical framework for implementation research. Acceptability (20, 57%) and feasibility (14, 40%) were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. The quality of reporting of implementation outcomes was low. The 35 studies evaluated 29 different interventions, of which 18 (62%) were implemented across sub-Saharan Africa, 20 (69%) focused on stigma related to HIV/AIDS, and 28 (97%) used information or education to reduce stigma. Intervention specification and description was uneven.

Conclusion

Implementation science could support the dissemination of stigma reduction interventions in LMICs, though usage to date has been limited. Theoretical frameworks and validated measures have not been used, key implementation outcomes like cost and sustainability have rarely been assessed, and intervention processes have not been presented in detail. Adapted frameworks, new measures, and increased LMIC-based implementation research capacity could promote the rigor of future stigma implementation research, helping the field deliver on the promise of stigma reduction interventions worldwide.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

BACK TO THE LIBRARY