Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Stélio Tembe

✪ Strengthening primary care facility management: a systematic review of management interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes in six sub-Saharan African countries

Authors:

Ermyas Birru, Sandra Urusaro, Aneth Dinis, Stélio Tembe, Teresa Jewell, Steve Gloyd, Kenneth Sherr, & Lisa R. Hirschhorn

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: July 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Primary Care

Abstract:

Background

Although primary health care (PHC) is central to health system performance, effective facility-level management is a critical determinant of service quality, resource use, and improved health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence on interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes aimed at strengthening PHC facility management in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review using thematic synthesis. Eight electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published between 2012 and 2022, focusing on interventions targeting PHC facility management in SSA. Implementation strategies were mapped to the thematic cluster areas of the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Implementation outcomes were classified using Proctor’s Implementation Outcome Framework, and management effectiveness domains were identified through thematic analysis.

Results

Of 3,752 studies screened, nine met the inclusion criteria. These studies represented six SSA countries: Botswana, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia. Four categories of intervention were identified: (1) training and capacity building programs, (2) peer-to-peer learning, (3) audit and feedback-based quality management systems, and (4) supportive supervision. These interventions were delivered through multiple implementation strategies, including training and education, coaching and mentoring, learning collaboratives, interactive continuous learning, and routine data monitoring. Acceptability was the most consistently reported implementation outcome. Improvements in management effectiveness were identified across four domains: financial management, organizational climate and culture, resource management and utilization, and human resource management. Five studies also reported intermediate service-level outcomes including improvements in maternal and child health indicators.

Conclusion

Interventions aimed at strengthening PHC facility management in SSA primarily emphasize skill development, collaboration, and ongoing managerial support, typically delivered through multiple strategies. However, few studies have evaluated these interventions using rigorous experimental or pragmatic study designs. More robust implementation research is needed to identify effective strategies for strengthening PHC facility management and supporting the consistent implementation of national PHC guidelines.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Cost of an Audit and Feedback intervention to increase uptake of maternal and child health services in Mozambique’s Primary health care

Authors:

Ermyas Birru, Aneth Dinis, Jonny Crocker, Quinhas Fernandes, Sarah Gimbel, Steve Gloyd, Artur Gremu, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Isaías Ramiro, Stelio Tembe, Orvalho Augusto & Kenneth Sherr

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Introduction

Despite high coverage of facility-based maternal and child health (MCH) services in Mozambique, preventable maternal and neonatal deaths remain among the highest globally. To address this, the Integrated District Evidence-to-Action (IDEAs) program was implemented from 2016 to 2020 in central Mozambique as a facility-level Audit and Feedback (A&F) strategy. IDEAs adapted traditional A&F into three components: 1) biannual facility readiness assessments, 2) A&F meetings to develop action plans, and 3) supportive supervision with funding for implementation. This study estimates total and component-specific implementation costs of IDEAs and compares them to average district health budgets.

Methods

Costs were estimated from a payer perspective following CHEERS guidelines, using both Gross and Microcosting methods. Costs were annualized over five years (2016–2020) with a 3% discount rate and are reported in 2020 USD. Staff time estimates were based on program staff consultations and national salary data. Outcomes include average cost per district and total annual cost by intervention component. We conducted a deterministic sensitivity analysis to identify cost drivers with the most significant impact on the overall cost.

Results

The IDEAs programs total (2016–2020) incurred total costs were $2,224,341 (2020 USD), with $1,702,648 (76.5%) for recurrent expenses and $495,323 (22.3%) for Capital expenses. Average annual district-level costs were $41,967, including A&F meetings ($10,893; 26.0%), Capital expenditures ($8255; 19.7%), targeted support ($9323; 22.2%) which includes $5700 (13.6%) for district-level cash transfers and $3623 (8.6%) for facility supervision, and readiness assessments ($6351; 15.1%).Per diems accounted for 52.0% of A&F meeting costs. IDEAs represented approximately 6.6% of the average district health budget. Implementation involved 33 participants with 2560 h yearly per district. Capital expenses were highly sensitive to when applying a standard 25% increase or decrease compared to other cost categories.

Conclusion

Our findings offer practical guidance for district-level planners to adapt and scale IDEAs. Policymakers and donors should integrate recurring costs into budgets and explore cost-saving strategies like virtual tools or streamlined meetings to improve sustainability. Future research must assess long-term integration into government programs and test alternative approaches across diverse low-resource settings to guide scaling.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Implementation outcomes of the integrated district evidence to action (IDEAs) program to reduce neonatal mortality in central Mozambique: an application of the RE-AIM evaluation framework

Authors:

Aneth Dinis, Quinhas Fernandes, Bradley H Wagenaar, Sarah Gimbel, Bryan J Weiner, Grace John-Stewart, Ermyas Birru, Stephen Gloyd, Ruth Etzioni, Dorlim Uetela, Isaías Ramiro, Artur Gremu, Orvalho Augusto, Stélio Tembe, Jaime L Mário, Jalilo E Chinai, Alfredo F Covele, Cassimo M Sáide, Nélia Manaca & Kenneth Sherr

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:

Background

Scarce evidence exists on audit and feedback implementation processes in low-resource health systems. The Integrated District Evidence to Action (IDEAs) is a multi-component audit and feedback strategy designed to improve the implementation of maternal and child guidelines in Mozambique. We report IDEAs implementation outcomes.

Methods

IDEAs was implemented in 154 health facilities across 12 districts in Manica and Sofala provinces between 2016 and 2020 and evaluated using a quasi-experimental design guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Reach is the proportion of pregnant women attending IDEAs facilities. Adoption is the proportion of facilities initiating audit and feedback meetings. Implementation is the fidelity to the strategy components, including readiness assessments, meetings (frequency, participation, action plan development), and targeted financial support and supervision. Maintenance is the sustainment at 12, 24, and 54 months.

Results

Across both provinces, 56% of facilities were exposed to IDEAs (target 57%). Sixty-nine and 73% of pregnant women attended those facilities’ first and fourth antenatal consultations (target 70%). All facilities adopted the intervention. 99% of the expected meetings occurred with an average interval of 5.9 out of 6 months. Participation of maternal and child managers was high, with 3076 attending meetings, of which 64% were from the facility, 29% from the district, and 7% from the province level. 97% of expected action plans were created, and 41 specific problems were identified. “Weak diagnosis or management of obstetric complications” was identified as the main problem, and “actions to reinforce norms and protocols” was the dominant subcategory of micro-interventions selected. Fidelity to semiannual readiness assessments was low (52% of expected facilities), and in completing micro-interventions (17% were completed). Ninety-six and 95% of facilities sustained the intervention at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and 71% had completed nine cycles at 54 months.

Conclusion

Maternal and child managers can lead audit and feedback processes in primary health care in Mozambique with high reach, adoption, and maintenance. The IDEAs strategy should be adapted to promote higher fidelity around implementing action plans and conducting readiness assessments. Adding effectiveness to these findings will help to inform strategy scale-up.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Identify Implementation Determinants for the Integrated District Evidence-to-Action Program, Mozambique

Authors:

Celso Inguane, Caroline Soi, Sarah Gimbel, Nélia Manaca, Isaías Ramiro, Florência Floriano, Georgina de Castro, Orvalho Augusto, Stélio Tembe, James Pfeiffer, Quinhas Fernandes, and Kenneth Sherr

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: September 2022

Read the full text in the open access journal Global Health: Science and Practice
BACK TO THE ARCHIVE

Abstract

Introduction

The Integrated District Evidence-to-Action program is an audit and feedback intervention introduced in 2017 in Manica and Sofala provinces, Mozambique, to reduce mortality in children younger than 5 years. We describe barriers and facilitators to early-stage effectiveness of that intervention.

Method

We embedded the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) into an extended case study design to inform sampling, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. We collected data in 4 districts in Manica and Sofala Provinces in November 2018. Data collection included document review, 22 in-depth individual interviews, and 2 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 19 provincial, district, and facility managers and nurses. Most participants (70.2%) were nurses and facility managers and the majority were women (87.8%). We audio-recorded all but 2 interviews and FGDs and conducted a consensus-based iterative analysis.

Results

Facilitators of effective intervention implementation included: implementation of the core intervention components of audit and feedback meetings, supportive supervision and mentorship, and small grants as originally planned; positive pressure from district managers and study nurses on health facility staff to strive for excellence; and easy access to knowledge and information about the intervention. Implementation barriers were the intervention’s lack of compatibility in not addressing the scarcity of human and financial resources and inadequate infrastructures for maternal and child health services at district and facility levels and; the intervention’s lack of adaptability in having little flexibility in the design and decision making about the use of intervention funds and data collection tools.

Discussion

Our comprehensive and systematic use of the CFIR within an extended case study design generated granular evidence on CFIR’s contribution to implementation science efforts to describe determinants of early-stage intervention implementation. It also provided baseline findings to assess subsequent implementation phases, considering similarities and differences in barriers and facilitators across study districts and facilities. Sharing preliminary findings with stakeholders promoted timely decision making about intervention implementation.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**