Skip to content

✪ The role of the outer setting in implementation: associations between state demographic, fiscal, and policy factors and use of evidence-based treatments in mental healthcare

Authors:

Eric J. Bruns, Elizabeth M. Parker, Spencer Hensley, Michael D. Pullmann, Philip H. Benjamin, Aaron R. Lyon & Kimberly E. Hoagwood

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: November 2019

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Despite consistent recognition of their influence, empirical study of how outer setting factors (e.g., policies, financing, stakeholder relationships) influence public systems’ investment in and adoption of evidence-based treatment (EBT) is limited. This study examined associations among unmodifiable (e.g., demographic, economic, political, structural factors) and modifiable (e.g., allocation of resources, social processes, policies, and regulations) outer setting factors and adoption of behavioral health EBT by US states.

Methods

Multilevel models examined relationships between state characteristics, an array of funding and policy variables, and state adoption of behavioral health EBTs for adults and children across years 2002–2012, using data from the National Association for State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute and other sources.

Results

Several unmodifiable state factors, including per capita income, controlling political party, and Medicaid expansion, predicted level of state fiscal investments in EBT. By contrast, modifiable factors, such as interagency collaboration and investment in research centers, were more predictive of state policies supportive of EBT. Interestingly, level of adult EBT adoption was associated with state fiscal supports for EBT, while child EBT adoption was predicted more by supportive policies. State per capita debt and direct state operation of services (versus contracting for services) predicted both child and adult EBT adoption.

Conclusions

State-level EBT adoption and associated implementation support is associated with an interpretable array of policy, financing, and oversight factors. Such information expands our knowledge base of the role of the outer setting in implementation and may provide insight into how best to focus efforts to promote EBT for behavioral health disorders.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Understanding the Organizational Implementation Context of Schools: A Qualitative Study of School District Administrators, Principals, and Teachers

Authors:

Jill Locke, Kristine Lee, Clayton R. Cook, Lindsay Frederick, Cheryl Vázquez-Colón, Mark G. Ehrhart, Gregory A. Aarons, Chayna Davis, & Aaron R. Lyon

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Published: November 2019

Subscription Required for Full Text Access
Read the full text in the subscription access journal School Mental Health

Organizational Readiness to Implement System Changes in an Alaskan Tribal Dental Care Organization

Authors:

C.L. Randall, K. Hort, C.E. Huebner, E. Mallott, L. Mancl, P. Milgrom, L. Nelson, K. Senturia, B.J. Weiner, J. Cunha-Cruz

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Published: September 2019

Read the open access full text in the subscription access journal JDR CLinical & Translational Research

More in Organizational Readiness for Change...

No additional publications in this category…yet!

More by UW First Authors…

No additional publications in this category…yet!

More in Organizational Assessment…

No additional publications in this category…yet!

✪ Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners

Authors:

Theresa J. Hoeft, Heather Wilcox, Ladson Hinton & Jürgen Unützer

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Published: April 2019

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

 

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE

Abstract:

Background

Collaborative care is an evidence-based program for treating depression in primary care. We sought to expand this model by recruiting clinics interested in incorporating community partners (i.e., community-based organizations (CBO) and/or family members) in the care team. Seven sites implemented evidence-based collaborative care programs with community partners while collecting information on costs of implementing and sustaining programs.

Methods

Sites retrospectively collected data on planning and implementation costs with technical assistance from study researchers. Sites also prospectively collected cost of care activities over a 1-month period once the program was implemented to determine resources needed to sustain programs. Personnel salary costs were adjusted, adding 30% for benefits and 30% for administrative overhead.

Results

The programs implemented varied considerably in staffing, involvement of care partners, and allocation of costs. Total planning and implementation costs varied from $39,280 to $60,575. The largest implementation cost category involved workflow development and ranged from $16,325 to $31,375 with the highest costs in this category attributed to the most successful implementation among clinic-CBO programs. Following implementation, cost per patient over the 1-month period ranged from $154 to $544. Ongoing strategic decision-making and administrative costs, which were included in cost of care, ranged from $284 to $2328 for the month.

Conclusions

Sites implemented collaborative care through differing partnerships, staffing, and related costs. Costs to implement and sustain programs developed in partnership are often not collected but are crucial to understanding financial aspects of developing sustainable partnerships. Assessing such costs is feasible and can inform future partnership efforts.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: a cross-sectional observational study

Authors:

Jill Locke, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Rinad S. Beidas, Gregory A. Aarons, Ming Xie, Aaron R. Lyon, Aubyn Stahmer, Max Seidman, Lindsay Frederick, Cristine Oh, Christine Spaulding, Shannon Dorsey & David S. Mandell

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2019

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Children with autism receive most of their intervention services in public schools, but implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism varies. Studies suggest that individual (attitudes) and organizational characteristics (implementation leadership and climate) may influence providers’ use of EBPs, but research is relatively limited in this area. This study examined individual and organizational factors associated with implementation of three EBPs—discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and visual schedules—for children with autism in special education classrooms in public elementary schools.

Methods

Participants included 67 autism support teachers and 85 other classroom staff from 52 public elementary schools in the northeastern United States. Participants reported their attitudes toward EBPs (e.g., intuitive appeal, willingness if required, openness, and divergence), implementation leadership and climate of their school, and the frequency with which they deliver each of three EBPs. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of attitudes about EBPs with organizational characteristics and intensity of EBP use. Demographic covariates with a bivariate association with EBP use significant at p < .20 were entered into the adjusted models.

Results

There were significant findings for only one EBP, discrete trial training. Teachers who reported higher perceived divergence (perceived difference of usual practice with academically developed or research-based practices) between EBPs and current practices used less discrete trial training (ƒ² = .18), and teachers who reported higher appeal (willingness to adopt EBPs given their intuitive appeal) of EBPs used more discrete trial training (ƒ² = .22). No organizational factors were significantly associated with implementation with any of the three EBPs.

Conclusions

Attitudes toward EBPs may affect teachers’ decisions to use EBPs; however, implementation leadership and climate did not predict EBP use. Future implementation efforts ought to consider the type of EBP and its fit within the context in terms of the EBP’s similarities to and differences from existing practices and programs in the setting. Implementation strategies that target individual attitudes about EBPs may be warranted in public schools.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: A qualitative study

Authors:

Jennifer Leeman, Natoshia Askelson, Linda K Ko, Catherine L Rohweder, Jade Avelis, Alicia Best, Daniela Friedman, Karen Glanz, Laura Seegmiller, Lindsay Stradtman, & Robin C Vanderpool

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: February 2019

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Translational Behavioral Medicine

The Pediatric Guideline Adherence and Outcomes (PEGASUS) programme in severe traumatic brain injury: A single-centre hybrid implementation and effectiveness study

Authors:

Monica S. Vavilala, Mary A. King, Jen-Ting Yang, Scott L. Erickson, Brianna Mills, Rosemary M. Grant, Carolyn Blayney, Qian Qiu, Randall M. Chesnut, Kenneth M. Jaffe, Bryan J. Weiner, & Brian D. Johnston

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: November 2018

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Lancet Child and Adolescent Health