UW Articles Archive - Page 16 of 60 - Implementation Science at UW

✪ The effect of proactive, interactive, two-way texting on 12-month retention in antiretroviral therapy: Findings from a quasi-experimental study in Lilongwe, Malawi

Abstract:

Background

Retaining clients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is challenging, especially during the first year on ART. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions show promise to close retention gaps. We aimed to assess reach (who received the intervention?) and effectiveness (did it work?) of a hybrid two-way texting (2wT) intervention to improve ART retention at a large public clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Methods

Between August 2021—June 2023, in a quasi-experimental study, outcomes were compared between two cohorts of new ART clients: 1) those opting into 2wT who received automated, weekly motivation short messaging service (SMS) messages and response-requested appointment reminders; and 2) a matched historical cohort receiving standard of care (SoC). Reach was defined as “the proportion clients ≤6 months of ART initiation eligible for 2wT”. 2wT effectiveness was assessed in time-to-event analysis. Retention was presented in a Kaplan-Meier plot and compared between 2wT and SoC using a log-rank test. The effect of 2wT on ART dropout (lost to follow-up or stopped ART) was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk regression models, adjusting for sex, age and WHO HIV stage at ART initiation.

Results

Of 1,146 clients screened, 501 were eligible for 2wT, a reach of 44%. Lack of phone (393/645; 61%) and illiteracy (149/645; 23%) were the most common ineligibility reasons. Among 468 participants exposed to 2wT, 12-month probability of ART retention was 91% (95% CI: 88% - 94%) compared to 76% (95% CI: 72% - 80%) among 468 SoC participants (p<0.001). Compared to SoC, 2wT participants had a 65% lower hazard of ART dropout at any timepoint (sub-distribution hazard ratio 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24–0.51; p<0.001).

Conclusions

2wT did not reach all clients. For those who opted-in, 2wT significantly increased 12-month ART retention. Expansion of 2wT as a complement to other retention interventions should be considered in other low-resource, routine ART settings.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care

✪ Are we being equitable enough? Lessons learned from sites lost in an implementation trial

Abstract:

Background

There is a growing interest in practice-based implementation research, yet too often research prioritizes and is most successful in academic settings. During a national implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Collaborative Care for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders, we lost three of our 11 participating implementation sites, all representing community sites.

Method

To better understand needed supports for implementation trial participation, we conducted exit interviews (n = 5) with key staff at these community sites. Interview transcripts were double-coded and analyzed using Rapid Assessment Process. Qualitative themes were iteratively reviewed by the study team.

Results

Three themes emerged characterizing challenges for community sites, including that: (1) research threatens sites’ most precious resource—staff; (2) staff lack comfort with and skills for research; and (3) research participation in its current form does not offer a clear return on investment.

Conclusions

Learnings from this work illuminate some of the barriers community sites face when trying to participate in multisite implementation research. An undercurrent of participant perspectives was the belief that community sites like theirs are just not set up to successfully participate in clinical trial research, including population-based implementation trials. Future implementation trials should consider strategies that disrupt traditional approaches, increasing the equitable inclusion of diverse practice settings in implementation research.

Plain Language Summary

There is a growing interest in research that reflects community settings. Yet too often, research is most successful in academic settings. During a national implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Collaborative Care for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders, we lost three of our 11 participating implementation sites, all representing community sites. To better understand their perspectives, we conducted exit interviews (n = 5) with staff at these community sites. Interview transcripts were double-coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Analysis identified three themes: (1) research threatens sites’ most precious resource—staff; (2) staff lack comfort with and skills for research, and (3) research participation in its current form does not offer a clear return on investment. Community sites face many barriers to participating in implementation research trials. Future trials should consider ways to disrupt traditional approaches and increase the equitable inclusion of community settings in implementation research.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Protocol for the Australian Type 1 Diabetes National Screening Pilot: Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of three general population screening models in children

Authors:

Kirstine J. Bell, Shannon Brodie, Jennifer J. Couper, Peter Colman, Elizabeth Davis, Gary Deed, William Hagopian, Aveni Haynes, Christel Hendrieckx, Amanda Henry, Adrienne Gordon, Kirsten Howard, Tony Huynh, Bernadette Kerr, Kara Mikler, Natasha Nassar, Sarah Norris, Richard Oram, Dorota Pawlak, Antonia Shand, Richard O. Sinnott, Bethany Wadling, John M. Wentworth, Maria E. Craig & the Type 1 Diabetes National Screening Pilot Study Group

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: August 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal Diabetes Medicine

Abstract:

Aim

One third of Australian children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes present with life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis. Screening for early-stage, presymptomatic type 1 diabetes, with ongoing follow-up, can substantially reduce this risk (<5% risk). Several screening models are being trialled internationally, without consensus on the optimal approach. This pilot study aims to assess three models for a routine, population-wide screening programme in Australia.

Methods

An implementation science-guided pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and costs of three screening models in children will be conducted between July 2022 and June 2024. These models are as follows: (1) Genetic risk-stratified screening using newborn heel prick dried bloodspots, followed by autoantibody testing from 11 months of age; (2) genetic risk-stratified screening of infant (6–12 months) saliva followed by autoantibody testing from 10 months of age; and (3) autoantibody screening using capillary dried bloodspots collected from children aged 2, 6 or 10 years. Cohorts for each model will be recruited from targeted geographic areas across Australia involving ≥2 states per cohort, with a recruitment target of up to 3000 children per cohort (total up to 9000 children). The primary outcome is screening uptake for each cohort. Secondary outcomes include programme feasibility, costs, parental anxiety, risk perception, satisfaction, well-being and quality of life, and health professional attitudes and satisfaction.

Conclusions

This pilot is the first direct comparison of three screening implementation models for general population screening. Findings will provide evidence to inform a potential national screening programme for Australian children.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening

✪ Implementation Science for HIV Prevention and Treatment in Indigenous Communities: a Systematic Review and Commentary

Authors:

Christopher G. Kemp (Ngāi Tahu), Abagail J. Edwards, Lauren White (Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma), Gauri Kore, Pamela Jumper Thurman (Cherokee), Tommi Gaines (Navajo, Hopi), Paula Toko King (Te Aupōuri, Te Rarawa, Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Whātua, Waikato Tainui, Ngāti Maniapoto), Marama Cole (Ngāti Kahungunu, Ngāti Porou) & E. Roberto Orellana (Maya)

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: August 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal Current HIV/AIDS Reports

Abstract:

Purpose of Review

We systematically reviewed implementation research conducted in Indigenous communities in the Americas and the Pacific that focused on improving delivery of HIV preventive or treatment services. We highlight strengths and opportunities in the literature and outline principles for Indigenous-led, HIV-related implementation science.

Recent Findings

We identified 31 studies, revealing a consistent emphasis on cultural tailoring of services to Indigenous communities. Common barriers to implementation included stigma, geographic limitations, confidentiality concerns, language barriers, and mistrust. Community involvement in intervention development and delivery emerged as a key facilitator, and nearly half of the studies used community-based participatory research methods. While behavioral HIV prevention, especially among Indigenous youth, was a major focus, there was limited research on biomedical HIV prevention and treatment. No randomized implementation trials were identified.

Summary

The findings underscore the importance of community engagement, the need for interventions developed within Indigenous communities rather than merely adapted, and the value of addressing the social determinants of implementation success. Aligned to these principles, an indigenized implementation science could enhance the acceptability and reach of critical HIV preventive and treatment services in Indigenous communities while also honoring their knowledge, wisdom, and strength.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Employing user-centered design to develop a remote technology kit for studying young children’s social communication skills

✪ Implementation of a bilingual and bicultural navigation program for Hispanic children with traumatic brain injuries

Abstract:

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects Hispanic children, with higher rates of severe injuries and worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White children. Patient navigation has shown effectiveness in improving health outcomes among Hispanic populations. However, culturally tailored navigation programs for pediatric TBI are lacking, and knowledge gaps remain regarding contextual factors influencing the implementation of these programs. This study examined factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of a bilingual and bicultural navigation program for caregivers of Hispanic children with TBIs.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 personnel involved in implementing the 1st Brain Injury Education and Outpatient Navigation (1st BIEN) program across four states. Directed content analysis was used based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide the development of the interview guide and data analysis.

Results

Key facilitators included the program’s adaptability to patient needs, bilingual/bicultural patient navigator’s skills, and alignment with organizational values. Barriers included restrictive healthcare regulatory policies hindering interinstitutional work, incomplete medical records, and gaps in behavioral support training.

Discussion

These findings offer insights for optimizing the implementation of patient navigation programs in pediatric TBI care, potentially improving access to care and reducing disparities for Hispanic children with brain injuries.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for pediatric diagnostic testing

✪ Increasing goals of care conversations in primary care: Study protocol for a cluster randomized, pragmatic, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial

Abstract:

Background

Goals of care conversations explore seriously ill patients' values to guide medical decision making and often inform decisions about life sustaining treatments. Ideally, conversations occur before a health crisis between patients and clinicians in the outpatient setting. In the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, most conversations still occur in the inpatient setting. Strategies are needed to improve implementation of outpatient, primary care goals of care conversations.

Methods

We plan a cluster randomized (clinician-level) sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patient implementation strategies on the outcome of goals of care conversation documentation when delivered in combination with clinician implementation strategies. Across three VA healthcare system sites, we will enroll primary care clinicians with low rates of goals of care conversations and their patients with serious medical illness in the top 10th percentile of risk of hospitalization or death. We will compare the effectiveness of sequences of implementation strategies and explore how patient and site factors modify implementation strategy effects. Finally, we will conduct a mixed-methods evaluation to understand implementation strategy success or failure. The design includes two key innovations: (1) strategies that target both clinicians and patients and (2) sequential strategies with increased intensity for non-responders.

Conclusion

This study aims to determine the effect of different sequences and combinations of implementation strategies on primary care documentation of goals of care conversations. Study partners, including the VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care and Office of Primary Care, can consider policies based on study findings.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal PLOS One

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Research and Practice

Abstract:

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Plain Language Summary

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Diabetes Medicine

Abstract:

Aim

Methods

Conclusions

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Genetics in Medicine

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Current HIV/AIDS Reports

Abstract:

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Brain Injury

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Genetics in Medicine

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Conclusion