Skip to content
Implementation Science at UW

Keywords: Allison Dvaladze

✪ Situational analysis of breast health care systems: Why context matters

Authors:

Catherine Duggan, Allison Dvaladze, John R. Scheel, Lisa M. Stevens, & Benjamin O. Anderson

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Background

Implementation of evidence‐based, resource‐appropriate guidelines for breast cancer control should be preceded by a baseline assessment or situational analysis to assess breast health infrastructure, workforce capacity, patient pathways, existing practices, accessibility, and costs.

Methods

To support the assessment of breast health care systems within the broader context in which they exist, the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) developed, tested, and refined a set of situational analysis tools with which to guide the assessment of breast health care capacity, identify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the health system, and support stakeholders in prioritizing actionable items to advance breast cancer care using evidence‐based strategies tailored to their setting. The tools address 6 domains of breast health care delivery: 1) breast cancer early detection practices; 2) breast cancer awareness programs; 3) the availability of breast cancer surgery; 4) the availability of pathology; 5) the availability of radiotherapy, and 6) the availability of systemic therapy services. The current study also describes the more comprehensive International Atomic Energy Agency Programme of Action for Cancer Therapy (PACT) integrated missions for PACT (imPACT) review.

Results

As of 2020, 5 formal BHGI situational analyses have been performed in India, Brazil, Panama, Tanzania, and Uganda. As of August 2019, a total of 100 imPACT reviews have been conducted in 91 countries. These assessments can contribute to more informed policymaking.

Conclusions

Situational analyses are a prerequisite for the development of resource‐appropriate strategies with which to advance breast cancer control in any setting and should assess services across the entire breast health care continuum as well as the broader structural, sociocultural, personal, and financial contexts within which they operate.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Breast cancer treatment: A phased approach to implementation

Authors:

Miriam Mutebi, Benjamin O. Anderson, Catherine Duggan, Clement Adebamowo, Gaurav Agarwal, Zipporah Ali, Peter Bird, Jean‐Marc Bourque, Rebecca DeBoer, Luiz Henrique Gebrim, Riccardo Masetti, Shahla Masood, Manoj Menon, Gertrude Nakigudde, Anne Ng’ang’a, Nixon Niyonzima, Anne F. Rositch, Karla Unger‐Saldaña, Cynthia Villarreal‐Garza, Allison Dvaladze, Nagi S. El Saghir, Julie R. Gralow, and Alexandru Eniu

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Optimal treatment outcomes for breast cancer are dependent on a timely diagnosis followed by an organized, multidisciplinary approach to care. However, in many low‐ and middle‐income countries, effective care management pathways can be difficult to follow because of financial constraints, a lack of resources, an insufficiently trained workforce, and/or poor infrastructure. On the basis of prior work by the Breast Health Global Initiative, this article proposes a phased implementation strategy for developing sustainable approaches to enhancing patient care in limited‐resource settings by creating roadmaps that are individualized and adapted to the baseline environment.

This strategy proposes that, after a situational analysis, implementation phases begin with bolstering palliative care capacity, especially in settings where a late‐stage diagnosis is common. This is followed by strengthening the patient pathway, with consideration given to a dynamic balance between centralization of services into centers of excellence to achieve better quality and decentralization of services to increase patient access. The use of resource checklists ensures that comprehensive therapy or palliative care can be delivered safely and effectively. Episodic or continuous monitoring with established process and quality metrics facilitates ongoing assessment, which should drive continual process improvements.

A series of case studies provides a snapshot of country experiences with enhancing patient care, including the implementation of national cancer control plans in Kenya, palliative care in Romania, the introduction of a 1‐stop clinic for diagnosis in Brazil, the surgical management of breast cancer in India, and the establishment of a women's cancer center in Ghana.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ The Breast Health Global Initiative 2018 Global Summit on Improving Breast Healthcare Through Resource‐Stratified Phased Implementation: Methods and overview

Authors:

Catherine Duggan, Allison Dvaladze, Anne F. Rositch, Ophira Ginsburg, Cheng‐Har Yip, Susan Horton, Rolando Camacho Rodriguez, Alexandru Eniu, Miriam Mutebi, Jean‐Marc Bourque, Shahla Masood, Karla Unger‐Saldaña, Anna Cabanes, Robert W. Carlson, Julie R. Gralow, and Benjamin O. Anderson

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

Background

The Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) established a series of resource‐stratified, evidence‐based guidelines to address breast cancer control in the context of available resources. Here, the authors describe methodologies and health system prerequisites to support the translation and implementation of these guidelines into practice.

Methods

In October 2018, the BHGI convened the Sixth Global Summit on Improving Breast Healthcare Through Resource‐Stratified Phased Implementation. The purpose of the summit was to define a stepwise methodology (phased implementation ) for guiding the translation of resource‐appropriate breast cancer control guidelines into real‐world practice. Three expert consensus panels developed stepwise, resource‐appropriate recommendations for implementing these guidelines in low‐income and middle‐income countries as well as underserved communities in high‐income countries. Each panel focused on 1 of 3 specific aspects of breast cancer care: 1) early detection, 2) treatment, and 3) health system strengthening.

Results

Key findings from the summit and subsequent article preparation included the identification of phased‐implementation prerequisites that were explored during consensus debates. These core issues and concepts are key components for implementing breast health care that consider real‐world resource constraints. Communication and engagement across all levels of care is vital to any effectively operating health care system, including effective communication with ministries of health and of finance, to demonstrate needs, outcomes, and cost benefits.

Conclusions

Underserved communities at all economic levels require effective strategies to deploy scarce resources to ensure access to timely, effective, and affordable health care. Systematically strategic approaches translating guidelines into practice are needed to build health system capacity to meet the current and anticipated global breast cancer burden.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation

Authors:

Ophira Ginsburg, Cheng‐Har Yip, Ari Brooks, Anna Cabanes, Maira Caleffi, Jorge Antonio, Dunstan Yataco, Bishal Gyawali, Valerie McCormack, Myrna McLaughlin de Anderson, Ravi Mehrotra, Alejandro Mohar, Raul Murillo, Lydia E. Pace, Electra D. Paskett, Anya Romanoff, Anne F. Rositch, John R. Scheel, Miriam Schneidman, Karla Unger‐Saldaña, Verna Vanderpuye, Tsu‐Yin Wu, Safina Yuma, Allison Dvaladze, Catherine Duggan, and Benjamin O. Anderson

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal Cancer

Abstract:

When breast cancer is detected and treated early, the chances of survival are very high. However, women in many settings face complex barriers to early detection, including social, economic, geographic, and other interrelated factors, which can limit their access to timely, affordable, and effective breast health care services. Previously, the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) developed resource‐stratified guidelines for the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.

In this consensus article from the sixth BHGI Global Summit held in October 2018, the authors describe phases of early detection program development, beginning with management strategies required for the diagnosis of clinically detectable disease based on awareness education and technical training, history and physical examination, and accurate tissue diagnosis. The core issues address include finance and governance, which pertain to successful planning, implementation, and the iterative process of program improvement and are needed for a breast cancer early detection program to succeed in any resource setting.

Examples are presented of implementation, process, and clinical outcome metrics that assist in program implementation monitoring. Country case examples are presented to highlight the challenges and opportunities of implementing successful breast cancer early detection programs, and the complex interplay of barriers and facilitators to achieving early detection for breast cancer in real‐world settings are considered.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**