EPIS Archives - Implementation Science at UW

✪ Implementation science frameworks and strategies to promote adoption of and adherence to oncology clinical practice guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Authors:

Anya Romanoff, Kathleen Lynch, Lily Martin, Olayide Agodirin, Shilpa Murthy, Olalekan Olasehinde, Chukwuma Okereke, Julia M. Jackman, Betel Yibrehu, William E. Rosa, Catherine Zivanov, Erica Mann, Joy O. Ogunmuyiwa, Colleen E. Witty, Victoria L. Mango, Olusegun Isaac Alatise, T. Peter Kingham, Rachel Vreeman, Benjamin O. Anderson & Jamie S. Ostroff

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: July 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Global Public Health

Abstract:

Background

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were developed to standardize and optimize cancer care delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this scoping review is to identify implementation science (IS) frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs.

Methods

We identified studies that describe, develop, reference, or utilize IS frameworks or strategies to deliver or evaluate adoption of oncology CPGs in LMICs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), African Journals Online, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO on 3/21/2022, 12/20/2022, 01/26/2024, and 10/03/2025. Publications in all languages and of all study types were eligible for inclusion. Titles, abstracts, and full text were screened by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Excluded studies did not use an IS framework or strategy, did not focus on cancer care, or were conducted in a high-income country.

Results

Searches identified 17,806 unique publications for title/abstract screening. 182 studies met criteria for full-text review; 35 were included. Twenty-four studies were country-specific, most commonly India (n = 5) and Nigeria (n = 5). The most frequent CPGs referenced were national/country-specific guidelines (n = 13) and Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) guidelines (n = 9). Only 16 full-text publications described original research to promote or evaluate evidence-based CPG interventions in LMICs. Established IS frameworks used in more than one study were the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework (n = 2) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (n = 2).

Conclusions

There is limited research utilizing IS frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs and substantial heterogeneity in reporting. Greater utilization of IS frameworks, strengthening implementation capacity and improving consistency in reporting, are needed to improve CPG uptake in LMICs.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nb75s).

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Exploring Factors Across Levels Impacting Educators’ Selection of Evidence-Based Practices for Autistic Students

Abstract:

Introduction

Front-line implementers report that selecting an evidence-based practice is the most challenging aspect of supporting Autistic students, which may contribute to the long-standing implementation gap. There is a need to understand educators’ (special education teachers’, general education teachers’, and paraeducators’) decision-making and determinants of their evidence-based practice (EBP) selection.

Method

This study aimed to identify educators’ decision-making factors, focusing on (a) information sources and (b) factors within the student, intervention, educator, and classroom levels. Eighty-one educators (general education teachers, special education teachers, and paraeducators) participated in semistructured interviews regarding their EBP selection for a specific student they served in inclusive classrooms.

Results

General and special education teachers cited EBP sources from their teacher preparation and colleagues with autism expertise, while paraeducators relied on existing classroom practices and guidance from other educators. EBP decision-making frequently revolved around student and intervention characteristics, focusing less on educator, environment, and resource determinants. Educators made individualized EBP decisions for each student, selecting EBPs that served all students. They also shared that their decision-making was most supported through collaboration, despite limited opportunity.

Conclusion

The study provides insights into key team members’ EBP selection for Autistic students to aid in the development of implementation supports.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Process evaluation and lessons learned from the formation of a multi-sector partnership: the Healing Experiences of Adversity among Latinos (HEALthy4You)

Authors:

Clare Viglione, Amy Westermann, Job Godino, Kyung E Rhee, Blanca Melendrez, Xin M Tu, David L Boyle, Michael Hogarth, Gregory A Aarons, Noe C Crespo, Pradeep Gidwani, Margarita Holguin, Cynthia Juarez, Deysi B Merino-Gonzalez, Liliana Osorio, Herminia Ramirez, Micaela Smith, Alec Terrana, Gary S Firestein & Eric Hekler

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

The Healing Experiences of Adversity Among Latinos (HEALthy4You; H4Y) study was a multi-sector partnership between an academic research institution, a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), and a multi-sector collective impact coalition focused on childhood obesity prevention. The goal of HEALthy4You was to develop community-centered and culturally appropriate precision interventions within FQHCs for Latino families to address predictors of adverse child experiences and treat childhood obesity. A multidisciplinary and multi-sector research, clinical, and community team (N = 29) was formed in September 2020 to co-design the study, which launched in June 2022. The team utilized a co-creation approach combined with the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to facilitate a collaborative design process. We conducted an internal and retrospective process evaluation in March 2023 to identify antecedents and situational factors associated with project formation, with a focus on understanding tensions and challenges with a broad partnership structure. We outline the team's co-creation process and describe internal challenges and pitfalls that emerged when developing the project. We sought to better understand the impact of differing perspectives, priorities, and goals between disciplines, sectors, and roles; differing approaches to evidence and evidence production; and team strategies to mitigate and manage competing pressures and priorities. This case report describes lessons learned, intending to share insights to support future development of best practices in project, partner, and team formation between researchers, clinicians, and community members. More specifically, these lessons could help inform community-led research endeavors between academic institutions, FQHCs, and community-based organizations (CBOs).

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ A pragmatic approach to estimating the cost to deliver and participate in implementation strategies

Abstract:

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Formative Evaluation to Inform Implementation of Sepsis Bundles in Emergency Departments

✪ Practical considerations for engaging staff in resource-constrained healthcare settings in implementation research: A qualitative focus group and consensus building study

Abstract:

Background

The primary purpose of this study was to assess perceived burdens and benefits of participating in implementation research among staff employed in resource-constrained healthcare settings. Another objective was to use findings to generate considerations for engaging staff in research across different phases of implementation research.

Methods

This qualitative focus group and consensus building study involved researchers affiliated with the National Cancer Institute Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control program and nine Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Massachusetts. Six focus groups (n = 3 with CHC staff; n = 3 with researchers) assessed barriers and facilitators to staff participation in implementation research. During consensus discussions, we used findings to develop considerations for engaging staff as participants and partners throughout phases of implementation research.

Results

Sixteen researchers and 14 staff participated in separate focus groups; nine researchers and seven staff participated in separate consensus discussions. Themes emerged across participant groups in three domains: (1) influences on research participation; (2) research burdens and benefits; and (3) ways to facilitate staff participation in research. Practical considerations included: (a) aligning research with organizational and staff values and priorities; (b) applying user-centered design to research methods; (c) building organizational and individual research capacity; and (d) offering equitable incentives for staff participation.

Conclusions

Engaging staff as participants and partners across different phases of implementation research requires knowledge about what contributes to research burden and benefits and addressing context-specific burdens and benefits.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Operational and organizational variation in determinants of policy implementation success: the case of policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services

Abstract:

Background

Research on determinants of health policy implementation is limited, and conceptualizations of evidence and implementation success are evolving in the field. This study aimed to identify determinants of perceived policy implementation success and assess whether these determinants vary according to: (1) how policy implementation success is operationally defined [i.e., broadly vs. narrowly related to evidence-based practice (EBP) reach] and (2) the role of a person’s organization in policy implementation. The study focuses on policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services.

Methods

Web-based surveys of professionals involved with earmarked tax policy implementation were conducted between 2022 and 2023 (N = 272). The primary dependent variable was a 9-item score that broadly assessed perceptions of the tax policy positively impacting multiple dimensions of outcomes. The secondary dependent variable was a single item that narrowly assessed perceptions of the tax policy increasing EBP reach. Independent variables were scores mapped to determinants in the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Multiple linear regression estimated associations between measures of determinants and policy implementation success.

Results

Perceptions of tax attributes (innovation determinant), tax EBP implementation climate (inner-context determinant), and inter-agency collaboration in tax policy implementation (outer-context and bridging factor determinant) were significantly associated with perceptions of policy implementation success. However, the magnitude of associations varied according to how success was operationalized and by respondent organization type. For example, the magnitude of the association between tax attributes and implementation success was 42% smaller among respondents at direct service organizations than non-direct service organizations when implementation success was operationalized broadly in terms of generating positive impacts (β = 0.37 vs. β = 0.64), and 61% smaller when success was operationalized narrowly in terms of EBP reach (β = 0.23 vs. β = 0.59). Conversely, when success was operationalized narrowly as EBP reach, the magnitude of the association between EBP implementation climate and implementation success was large and significant among respondents at direct service organizations while it was not significant among respondents from non-direct service organizations (β = 0.48 vs. β=-0.06).

Conclusion

Determinants of perceived policy implementation success may vary according to how policy implementation success is defined and the role of a person’s organization in policy implementation. This has implications for implementation science and selecting policy implementation strategies.

Contributions to the literature

The current study contributes to limited knowledge focused on determinants of policy implementation and scholarship about broadening definitions of evidence and implementation success in the field of implementation science.
Attributes of earmarked tax policies, tax policy EBP implementation climate, and frequency of inter-agency collaboration in tax policy implementation are significant determinants of tax policy implementation success and could be targeted by policy implementation strategies.
Determinants of policy implementation success vary according to how policy implementation success is operationally defined (broadly vs. narrowly related to EBP reach) and the role of a person’s organization in policy implementation the process.
Linking policy implementation determinants to the EPIS framework advances understanding of how implementation science frameworks can advance the study of policy implementation.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Relevance of learning health systems to physiatrists and its synergy with implementation science: A commentary

Abstract:

As health care attempts to bridge the gap between evidence and practice, the concept of the learning health system (LHS) is becoming increasingly relevant. LHS integrates evidence with health systems data, driving health care quality and outcomes through updates in policy, practice, and care delivery. In addition, LHS research is becoming critically important as there are several initiatives underway to increase research capacity, expertise, and implementation, including attempts to stimulate increasing numbers of LHS researchers. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians (physiatrists), nurses, therapists (physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, clinical psychologists), and scientists are affiliated with LHSs. As LHS research expands in health care systems, better awareness and understanding of LHSs and LHS research competencies are key for rehabilitation professionals including physiatrists. To address this need, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) identified 33 core competencies, grouped into eight domains, for training LHS researchers. The domains are: (1) Systems Science; (2) Research Questions and Standards of Scientific Evidence; (3) Research Methods; (4) Informatics; (5) Ethics of Research and Implementation in Health Systems; (6) Improvement and Implementation Science; (7) Engagement, Leadership, and Research Management; and the recently added (8) Health and Healthcare Equity and Justice. The purpose of this commentary is to define LHS and its relevance to physiatrists, present the role of implementation science (IS) in LHSs and application of IS principles to design LHSs, illustrate current LHS research in rehabilitation, and discuss potential solutions to improve awareness and to stimulate interest in LHS research and IS among physiatrists in LHSs.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Inter-organizational alignment and implementation outcomes in integrated mental healthcare for children and adolescents: a cross-sectional observational study

Abstract:

Background

Integrated care involves care provided by a team of professionals, often in non-traditional settings. A common example worldwide is integrated school-based mental health (SBMH), which involves externally employed clinicians providing care at schools. Integrated mental healthcare can improve the accessibility and efficiency of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for vulnerable populations suffering from fragmented traditional care. However, integration can complicate EBP implementation due to overlapping organizational contexts, diminishing the public health impact. Emerging literature suggests that EBP implementation may benefit from the similarities in the implementation context factors between the different organizations in integrated care, which we termed inter-organizational alignment (IOA). This study quantitatively explored whether and how IOA in general and implementation context factors are associated with implementation outcomes in integrated SBMH.

Methods

SBMH clinicians from community-based organizations (CBOs; nclinician = 27) and their proximal student-support school staff (nschool = 99) rated their schools and CBOs (clinician only) regarding general (organizational culture and molar climate) and implementation context factors (Implementation Climate and Leadership), and nine common implementation outcomes (e.g., treatment integrity, service access, acceptability). The levels of IOA were estimated by intra-class correlations (ICCs). We fitted multilevel models to estimate the standalone effects of context factors from CBOs and schools on implementation outcomes. We also estimated the 2-way interaction effects between CBO and school context factors (i.e., between-setting interdependence) on implementation outcomes.

Results

The IOA in general context factors exceeded those of implementation context factors. The standalone effects of implementation context factors on most implementation outcomes were larger than those of general context factors. Similarly, implementation context factors between CBOs and schools showed larger 2-way interaction effects on implementation outcomes than general context factors.

Conclusions

This study preliminarily supported the importance of IOA in context factors for integrated SBMH. The findings shed light on how IOA in implementation and general context factors may be differentially associated with implementation outcomes across a broad array of integrated mental healthcare settings.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Drivers of success: improving implementation research tools for better health outcomes

Abstract:

A thorough examination of context, and how it influences implementation of evidence-based interventions, is a promising strategy for enhancing child survival initiatives. Spreading approaches that are identified as drivers of successful reduction in under-five mortality from ‘exemplar’ countries could be pivotal in leading to reductions in other settings facing stagnant mortality rates, in particular for low- and middle-income countries with high disease burden and insufficient programmatic capacity to effectively implement evidence-based interventions at scale. Yet there remains a lack of robust analytic methods to accurately assess mortality and describe the drivers of interventions’ implementation success at both national and subnational levels. The field of implementation science and its defining targets and tools is well positioned to address this knowledge gap by integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods into an adaptable evaluation framework that can be tailored to meet the specific needs across varying country contexts. These tools enhance the measurement of population health outcomes and provide crucial evidence on implementation barriers and facilitators that can inform policies that can be adjusted for diverse contexts. This commentary aims to emphasize the role of implementation research in understanding how exemplar countries achieved significant improvements in child survival and in identifying replicable lessons for other settings. Ultimately, all manuscripts underscore the relevance of implementation research in bolstering the reduction of under-five mortality.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Global Public Health

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Systematic review registration

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Research and Practice

Abstract:

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Annals of Emergency Medicine

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementaion Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Pediatrics

Abstract: