Perspective Archives - Implementation Science at UW

✪ Reciprocal innovation in implementation science and global health: reflections from the EXTRA-CVD (extending the HIV treatment cascade for cardiovascular disease prevention) study

Abstract:

Reciprocal innovation, a model of sustained, multidirectional exchange in which health strategies are adapted, revisited, and refined across contexts, offers a compelling framework to rethink how implementation science can support global health equity by enabling dynamic, multidirectional learning across different contexts. Drawing on the EXTRA-CVD trial, a nurse-led cardiovascular disease prevention intervention designed to extend the HIV treatment cascade in United States (U.S.) HIV clinics, which adapted strategies informed by implementation research in Kenya and the U.S. Veterans Affairs health system, this perspective examines how reciprocal innovation can begin to emerge within existing research structures, as well as where opportunities for deeper exchange remain limited. We identify four operational domains of reciprocal innovation: care delivery strategies, end-user engagement, research methodologies, and research leadership and partnership. Across these domains, we describe how cross-context learning shaped intervention adaptation and site-level implementation in EXTRA-CVD, as well as missed opportunities where more intentional feedback, shared leadership, and methodological exchange could have strengthened multidirectional learning. Taken together, this work highlights both the potential and the practical challenges of reciprocal innovation in implementation research, emphasizing its role in moving beyond unidirectional knowledge transfer toward iterative, context-responsive learning. By embedding structures for iterative feedback, equity-centered governance, and multidirectional learning systems within research and implementation systems, future global partnerships can foster more inclusive, responsive, and sustainable health interventions.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Towards a decolonising implementation science: principles from Indigenous leadership

Abstract:

Summary

Implementation science is a diverse and evolving field that draws on multiple epistemologies and methods. However, the dominant foundations of implementation science remain settler colonial, biomedical, and positivist. In Indigenous and other marginalised settings, these foundations can result in poor epistemological, ethical, and practical fit. We argue that a paradigm shift that is grounded in Indigenous values, sovereignty, relationality, and epistemologies is needed. We propose seven guiding principles for a decolonising implementation science. Drawing from emerging scholarship and innovative Indigenous-led frameworks from the USA, Aotearoa New Zealand, and Australia, these principles centre sovereignty, strengths-based approaches, and relational accountability. These principles also offer a roadmap to redefine rigour, expand what counts as evidence, and ensure genuine community control over the research process. Although born from Indigenous experience, these principles provide a framework for transforming implementation science to be more just, equitable, and effective for marginalised communities globally.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Increasing access without compromising quality: optimizing telemedicine care in pediatric rheumatology

Abstract:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic immune-mediated condition affecting approximately 1 in 1,000 children in the United States. Without appropriate treatment, JIA can lead to permanent disability, chronic pain, and impaired quality of life. Targeted treatment strategies have enabled some patients to achieve sustained inactive disease and improved outcomes. However, the ongoing workforce shortage of pediatric rheumatologists poses a barrier to accessing effective care for many patients and families. Telemedicine is a potential solution to improving access to care for patients who travel significant distances to obtain pediatric rheumatology healthcare. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine saw rapid adoption with exponential uptake in use during unprecedented circumstances and resulted in inconsistent implementation of this emerging healthcare modality. While virtual visits offer many benefits, they often fail in gathering critical data elements required for measuring and tracking health outcomes, engaging in data-driven shared decision making, population health management and secondary research. In response to these challenges, the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) Digital Health Workgroup conducted a needs assessment among its members to identify opportunities and barriers for optimizing telemedicine visits for patients with JIA. Based on this assessment, potential interventions and instructional materials were developed and compiled into a “change package” to assist rheumatology teams in planning, implementing and evaluating improvements to telemedicine visits at their centers. This change package is publicly available on the PR-COIN website for adoption and use (https://www.pr-coin.org/center-tools-resources). Continuous evaluation and adaptation of these tools are essential as telemedicine practices continue to evolve.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Environmental sustainability, an essential outcome for implementation scientists to improve health

Abstract:

While there is evidence of humans' harmful impact on the environment, translating such evidence into changes is challenging. Implementation science can facilitate a shift from a reactive to proactive approach in tackling environmental sustainability. This article aims to spur further discussion among implementation scientists to incorporate environmental sustainability within their research, while also offering concepts relevant to environmental science researchers seeking to apply implementation science principles.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Perspectives on Implementing a Communication Facilitator Intervention From a Critical Care Setting

✪ Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS): Reflections and recommendations

Abstract:

Organizations exert influence on the implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations that are independent of the influence of organizations' individual constituents. Despite their influence, nuanced explanations of organizations' influence remain limited in implementation science. Organization theories are uniquely suited to offer insights and explain organizational influences on implementation. In this paper, we describe the efforts of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's (CPCRN) Organization Theory for Implementation Science (OTIS) workgroup to equip implementation scientists with theory-guided understanding of organizational influences on implementation. We provide a set of recommendations for future efforts to enhance implementation through the use of organization theories and OTIS tools.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Combining legal epidemiology and implementation science to improve global access to medicines: challenges and opportunities

Abstract:

Laws and policies affecting access to medicines have been in the global health spotlight for decades, yet our understanding of their effects remains substantially underdeveloped. The emerging field of legal epidemiology combined with the methods of implementation science presents an opportunity to help address this gap. Legal epidemiology refers to the scientific study and deployment of law as a factor in the cause, distribution, and prevention of disease and injury in a population. Legal epidemiology studies consist of a systematic collection and coding of laws and policies relating to a particular topic. Quasi-experimental or observational research methods can then be applied to take advantage of natural experiments resulting from heterogenous adoption and/or implementation of laws and policies.

Often legal epidemiology studies fail to account for heterogenous law implementation processes, presenting a need and opportunity to integrate implementation science methods. Researchers may face challenges in integrating these methods for access to medicines studies, including data access issues and a complex legal and implementation environment. Yet, the opportunities presented by increasingly transparent legal environments, improved monitoring of medicine availability, universal health coverage expansion, and electronic health and insurance records integration may facilitate overcoming these challenges. Improved collaboration and communication between researchers, health authorities, manufacturers, and health providers from public and private sectors will be critical. In spite of the challenges, combining the fields of legal epidemiology and implementation science may present an important strategy toward creating a legal and policy environment that supports global and equitable access to medicines.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Theorizing is for everybody: Advancing the process of theorizing in implementation science

Abstract:

There has been a call to shift from treating theories as static products to engaging in a process of theorizing that develops, modifies, and advances implementation theory through the accumulation of knowledge. Stimulating theoretical advances is necessary to improve our understanding of the causal processes that influence implementation and to enhance the value of existing theory.

We argue that a primary reason that existing theory has lacked iteration and evolution is that the process for theorizing is obscure and daunting. We present recommendations for advancing the process of theorizing in implementation science to draw more people in the process of developing and advancing theory.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Realist evaluation in times of decolonising global health

✪ Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: A call to action

Abstract:

Background

In several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing implementation strategies to fit the existing culture, infrastructure, and practice of a healthcare system. Worldwide, healthcare systems are adopting improvement models as their primary approach to improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. The prevalence of improvement models raises the question of how implementation scientists might best align their efforts with healthcare systems’ existing improvement infrastructure and practice.

Main body

We describe three challenges and five benefits to aligning implementation science and improvement practice. Challenges include (1) use of different models, terminology, and methods, (2) a focus on generalizable versus local knowledge, and (3) limited evidence in support of the effectiveness of improvement tools and methods. We contend that implementation science needs to move beyond these challenges and work toward greater alignment with improvement practice. Aligning with improvement practice would benefit implementation science by (1) strengthening research/practice partnerships, (2) fostering local ownership of implementation, (3) generating practice-based evidence, (4) developing context-specific implementation strategies, and (5) building practice-level capacity to implement interventions and improve care. Each of these potential benefits is illustrated in a case study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network.

Conclusion

To effectively integrate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, implementation scientists need to align their efforts with the improvement culture and practice that is driving change within healthcare systems worldwide. This paper provides concrete examples of how researchers have aligned implementation science with improvement practice across five implementation projects.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Global Public Health

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Lancet Global Health

Abstract:

Summary

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Main body

Conclusion