Skip to content

✪ “Though there are some challenges, we try our best to follow the guidelines”: a qualitative study exploring determinants of providing guideline-adherent care to hospitalized children in Kenya

Authors:

Megan M. Coe, Riffat Ara Shawon, Mary Masheti, Chrisantus Oduol, Phlona Amam, Geofrey Okoth Olieng’o, Molline Timbwa, Martin Kamui, Johnstone Thitiri, Sarah Gimbel, Benson Singa & Arianna Rubin Means

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communication

Abstract:

Background

Clinical treatment guidelines are designed to improve quality of care by offering clear recommendations for health workers; however, across many settings, implementing guidelines is a challenge. For over 20 years, comprehensive World Health Organization guidelines for care of hospitalized children have provided guidance for treating the primary causes of childhood death. These recommendations were adapted in Kenya and codified in the Basic Paediatric Protocol; however, adherence to these evidence-based interventions remains suboptimal.

Methods

This qualitative study identified the barriers and facilitators of providing guideline-adherent care to children admitted to two hospitals in Kenya. The semi-structured question guide was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Three focus group discussions and 16 in-depth interviews were conducted with 35 health workers. Participants were nurses, doctors, clinical officers, or nutritionists (including in-charges and clinical supervisors). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were coded using a TDF-based codebook, validated, and analyzed for themes.

Results

TDF domains with the greatest influence on the thematic findings were environmental context and resources, social influences, beliefs about consequences, and beliefs about capabilities. Health workers were knowledgeable about guidelines and felt strongly that adherence to them was beneficial; however, they also faced barriers implementing them. Challenges related to the environmental context were pervasive, including shortages of staff and supplies. Participants praised the simplicity of guidelines but also noted that simplified diagnostic criteria don’t align with complex patient presentations. While guidelines empowered some nurses to make clinical decisions, respondents reported that strict professional roles sometimes delayed diagnosis and treatment. Further, health workers reported some deviations were intentional (ex. when guidelines were not aligned to their beliefs) and other times they were unintentional (ex. when complex patient presentations make guideline adherence difficult).

Conclusions

Knowledge of guidelines and motivation to use them were not major determinants in this analysis. Rather, human and material resource shortages presented the greatest barrier to guideline adherence in this setting. Improving guidelines by involving health workers in participatory development of guidelines would improve both clarity and feasibility. Health workers are well-versed in guideline recommendations, so educational strategies should focus on knowledge gaps or changes in the latest version of guidelines.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Enduring contributions to implementation science: Honoring the legacy of Bryan R. Garner

Authors:

Sara J Becker, James H Ford II, Joseph E Glass, Heather J Gotham, Hannah K Knudsen, Andrew Quanbeck, Mat Roosa & Emily C Williams

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

With heavy hearts, we are writing to celebrate the scientific contributions of our colleague and friend, Bryan R. Garner, PhD, who passed away incomprehensibly at the age of 49 on June 20, 2025. Bryan was a professor at The Ohio State University, where he served as Director of Dissemination & Implementation Science in the Division of General Internal Medicine and Director of Dissemination & Implementation Research for the Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking (CATALYST). Bryan formed enduring collaborations and friendships across the institutions where he worked and trained. He maintained career-long relationships with colleagues from Texas Christian University, where he earned his PhD in Experimental Psychology (1–3), and from Chestnut Health Systems (4–7) and RTI International (8–10), where he built and expanded his research program.

Implementing Payer Partnerships for Patient Care Programs within Clinically Integrated Networks of Community Pharmacies: A Qualitative Study

Authors:

Christopher Daly, Durdana N. Iqbal, Jessica B. Finke, Kim C. Coley, William R. Doucette, Stefanie P. Ferreri, Sophia M.C. Herbert, David M. Jacobs, Randy McDonough, Melissa A. Somma McGivney, Wesley Nuffer, Megan G. Smith & Jennifer L. Bacci

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Journal of the American Pharmacy Association

Tailored strategies to increase the use of an evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: A stepped-wedge randomized trial in military clinics

Authors:

Craig S Rosen, Alan L Peterson, David S Riggs, Christopher K Haddock, Chunki Fong, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Jeffrey Cook, Katherine Anne Comtois, Elisa V Borah, C Adrian Davis, Katherine A Dondanville, Erin P Finley, Sara A Jahnke, Melissa Mistretta, Andrea Neitzer, Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman, Erin R Frick, Olivia Hayes, Spencer Clayton, Allison M Conforte, Araceli Flores, Jeremy Jinkerson , Zachary K Jones, Hana J Kim, Margaret Letendre, Jared S Link, Debra Nofziger, Erik N Ringdahl, John W Waggoner, Craig Woodworth, Emily Ho, Carmen P McLean & TACTICS Research Group

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Journal of Anxiety Disorders

✪ Process evaluation and lessons learned from the formation of a multi-sector partnership: the Healing Experiences of Adversity among Latinos (HEALthy4You)

Authors:

Clare Viglione, Amy Westermann, Job Godino, Kyung E Rhee, Blanca Melendrez, Xin M Tu, David L Boyle, Michael Hogarth, Gregory A Aarons, Noe C Crespo, Pradeep Gidwani, Margarita Holguin, Cynthia Juarez, Deysi B Merino-Gonzalez, Liliana Osorio, Herminia Ramirez, Micaela Smith, Alec Terrana, Gary S Firestein & Eric Hekler

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

The Healing Experiences of Adversity Among Latinos (HEALthy4You; H4Y) study was a multi-sector partnership between an academic research institution, a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), and a multi-sector collective impact coalition focused on childhood obesity prevention. The goal of HEALthy4You was to develop community-centered and culturally appropriate precision interventions within FQHCs for Latino families to address predictors of adverse child experiences and treat childhood obesity. A multidisciplinary and multi-sector research, clinical, and community team (N = 29) was formed in September 2020 to co-design the study, which launched in June 2022. The team utilized a co-creation approach combined with the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to facilitate a collaborative design process. We conducted an internal and retrospective process evaluation in March 2023 to identify antecedents and situational factors associated with project formation, with a focus on understanding tensions and challenges with a broad partnership structure. We outline the team's co-creation process and describe internal challenges and pitfalls that emerged when developing the project. We sought to better understand the impact of differing perspectives, priorities, and goals between disciplines, sectors, and roles; differing approaches to evidence and evidence production; and team strategies to mitigate and manage competing pressures and priorities. This case report describes lessons learned, intending to share insights to support future development of best practices in project, partner, and team formation between researchers, clinicians, and community members. More specifically, these lessons could help inform community-led research endeavors between academic institutions, FQHCs, and community-based organizations (CBOs).

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ A pragmatic approach to estimating the cost to deliver and participate in implementation strategies

Authors:

Hannah Cheng, Maryam Abdel Magid, Mark P. McGovern, James H. Ford II, Veena Manja, Hélène Chokron Garneau & Todd H. Wagner

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science

Abstract:

The Healing Experiences of Adversity Among Latinos (HEALthy4You; H4Y) study was a multi-sector partnership between an academic research institution, a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), and a multi-sector collective impact coalition focused on childhood obesity prevention. The goal of HEALthy4You was to develop community-centered and culturally appropriate precision interventions within FQHCs for Latino families to address predictors of adverse child experiences and treat childhood obesity. A multidisciplinary and multi-sector research, clinical, and community team (N = 29) was formed in September 2020 to co-design the study, which launched in June 2022. The team utilized a co-creation approach combined with the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to facilitate a collaborative design process. We conducted an internal and retrospective process evaluation in March 2023 to identify antecedents and situational factors associated with project formation, with a focus on understanding tensions and challenges with a broad partnership structure. We outline the team's co-creation process and describe internal challenges and pitfalls that emerged when developing the project. We sought to better understand the impact of differing perspectives, priorities, and goals between disciplines, sectors, and roles; differing approaches to evidence and evidence production; and team strategies to mitigate and manage competing pressures and priorities. This case report describes lessons learned, intending to share insights to support future development of best practices in project, partner, and team formation between researchers, clinicians, and community members. More specifically, these lessons could help inform community-led research endeavors between academic institutions, FQHCs, and community-based organizations (CBOs).

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Editorial: Using the RE-AIM framework and other implementation theories, models, and frameworks to guide the implementation and evaluation of rural health innovations

Authors:

Heather Schacht Reisinger, Teresa Damush, Teresa Damush,Erin Balkenende, Edwin Wong, Kanika Arora, Rachael R. Kenney, Laura D. Taylor & Monica Matthieu

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

From Tanzania to Washington, DC: Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and ADAPT-ITT Model to Guide the Development of a Community-Based PrEP Intervention for Black Adults

Authors:

Waimar Tun, Jennifer Gomez-Berrospi, Samuel Janson, Demarc Hickson, Christian Morris, Julie Pulerwitz, Mamaswatsi Kopeka, Jesse Yao, Rikiyah Mixson, Amanda McHale, Rachel Macey, Christian Buchanan, Bukola Rinola, Naana Koranteng-Yorke, Deanna Kerrigan, Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu, Donaldson F. Conserve & BRIDGE Research Team

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal AIDS and Behavior

✪ Environmental sustainability, an essential outcome for implementation scientists to improve health

Authors:

Virginia Mckay, Emmanuel Tetteh, Nicholas Wong, C Bradley Kramer & Jason Burnham

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:

While there is evidence of humans' harmful impact on the environment, translating such evidence into changes is challenging. Implementation science can facilitate a shift from a reactive to proactive approach in tackling environmental sustainability. This article aims to spur further discussion among implementation scientists to incorporate environmental sustainability within their research, while also offering concepts relevant to environmental science researchers seeking to apply implementation science principles.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**