Skip to content

Provider Perspectives on Implementing Shared Decision Making for PTSD Treatment in VA Primary Care

Authors:

Jessica A. Chen, Theresa E. Matson, Keren Lehavot, Patrick J. Raue, Jessica P. Young, Molly C. Silvestrini, John C. Fortney, & Emily C. Williams

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: February 2021

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

✪ Incorporating Method Dissatisfaction into Unmet Need for Contraception: Implications for Measurement and Impact

Authors:

Claire W. Rothschild, Win Brown, & Alison L. Drake

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2021

Read the full text in the open access journal Studies in Family Planning

Abstract:

While unmet need for contraception is commonly used to assess programmatic needs, it inadequately captures the complexity of fertility and contraceptive preferences, including women's satisfaction with their contraceptive method. In their 2019 commentary, Sarah Rominski and Rob Stephenson propose reclassifying dissatisfied current users as having an unmet need for contraception. As revising the current definition based on their proposal would require significant investment to update survey and monitoring systems, understanding the potential impact on current estimates of unmet need is critical.

We estimated the impact of this approach in a Kenyan cohort of modern contraceptive users. We found the prevalence of method dissatisfaction ranges from 6.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6–7.8%) to 18.9% (95% CI 17.1–20.9%); if applied nationally, this results in a large (approximately 25–70%) increase in Kenya's current estimate of unmet need for any contraception. Our findings suggest a large impact on unmet need estimates for equivalent populations.

Overall, we advocate for better measurements of method satisfaction and acceptability, with metrics developed that are robust to socioeconomic gradients and validated in low- and middle-income settings to ensure women's contraceptive needs are captured equitably.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Implementing Goals-of-Care Conversations: Lessons From High- and Low-Performing Sites From a VA National Initiative

Authors:

Cati Brown-Johnson, Marie C Haverfield, Karleen F Giannitrapani, Natalie Lo, Jill S Lowery, Mary Beth Foglia, Anne M Walling, David B Bekelman, Scott T Shreve, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Karl A Lorenz

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: February 2020

Read the full text in the subscription access Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

✪ Applying human-centered design to maximize acceptability, feasibility, and usability of mobile technology supervision in Kenya: A mixed methods pilot study protocol

Authors:

Noah S. Triplett, Sean Munson, Anne Mbwayo, Teresia Mutavi, Bryan J. Weiner, Pamela Collins, Cyrilla Amanya, & Shannon Dorsey

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: January 2021

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Although research continues to support task-shifting as an effective model of delivering evidence-based practices (EBPs), little scholarship has focused how to scale up and sustain task-shifting in low- and middle-income countries, including how to sustainably supervise lay counselors. Ongoing supervision is critical to ensure EBPs are delivered with fidelity; however, the resources and expertise required to provide ongoing supervision may limit the potential to scale up and sustain task shifting. Opportunities may exist to leverage mobile technology to replace or supplement in-person supervision in low-resource contexts, but contextual variables, such as network connectivity and lay counselor preferences surrounding mobile technology, must be examined and considered when designing and implementing mobile technology supervision.

Methods

This study builds from an existing randomized trial in Kenya, wherein teachers and community health volunteers have been trained to provide trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy as lay counselors. The study will use an iterative and mixed methods approach, with qualitative interviews and a Human-Centered Design (HCD) workshop informing a non-randomized pilot trial. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with lay counselors and supervisors to understand how mobile technology is currently being used for supervision and determine the barriers and facilitators to mobile technology supervision. Data from these interviews will inform an HCD workshop, where lay counselors and supervisors “re-design” supervision to most effectively leverage mobile technology. Workshop participants will also participate in focus groups to gather perceptions on the use of HCD techniques. The final outcome of the workshop will be a set of refined workflows, which will be tested in a mixed method, nonrandomized pilot with newly trained lay counselors and existing supervisors. The pilot trial will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and usability of mobile technology supervision through self-report questionnaires as well as perceptions of effectiveness through qualitative interviews with a subset of lay counselors and all supervisors.

Discussion

This study will provide a launching point for future research on supervision and methods to engage stakeholders to design and tailor interventions and implementation supports to fit low-resourced contexts.

Trial registration

The parent trial from which this study builds was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on August 9, 2017 (NCT03243396).

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Design of a study to implement population-based risk assessment for hereditary cancer genetic testing in primary care

Authors:

Deborah J. Bowen, Catharine Wang, Allison M. Cole, Barbara M. Norquist, Sarah Knerr, Beth Devine, Brian Shirts, Kevin Cain, Heather M. Harris, Helen G. Haile, Elizabeth M. Swisher

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: December 2020

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Contemporary Clinical Trials

Organizational readiness assessment in acute and long-term care has important implications for antibiotic stewardship for asymptomatic bacteriuria

Authors:

Melanie C. Goebel, Barbara W. Trautner, Yiqun Wang, John N. Van, Laura M. Dillon, Payal K. Patel, Dimitri M. Drekonja, Christopher J. Graber, Bhavarth S. Shukla, Paola Lichtenberger, Christian D. Helfrich, Anne Sales, & Larissa Grigoryan

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: May 2020

Read the full text in the subscription access American Journal of Infection Control

Use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to Characterize Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives on Financial Incentives to Increase Pediatric HIV Testing

Authors:

Dana Atkins, Anjuli D. Wagner, Junyi Zhang, Irene N. Njuguna, Jillian Neary, Vincent O. Omondi, Verlinda A. Otieno, Kenneth Ondeng'e, Dalton C. Wamalwa, Grace John-Stewart, Jennifer A. Slyker, and Kristin Beima-Sofie

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: May 2020

Read the full text in the subscription access journal JAIDS

✪ First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders

Authors:

Laura-Mae Baldwin, Jennifer L. Schneider, Malaika Schwartz, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Beverly B. Green, Amanda F. Petrik & Gloria D. Coronado

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2020

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:

Background

Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among certain racial and ethnic groups and the uninsured and Medicaid insured. Clinics and health care systems have adopted population-based mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) programs to increase screening, and now health insurance plans are beginning to implement mailed FIT programs. We report on challenges to and successes of mailed FIT programs during their first year of implementation in two health plans serving Medicaid and dual eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees.

Methods

This qualitative descriptive study gathered data through in-depth interviews with staff and leaders at each health plan (n = 10). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, field notes from program planning meetings between the research team and the health plans, and internal research team debriefs informed interview guide development. Qualitative research staff used Atlas.ti to code the health plan interviews and develop summary themes through an iterative content analysis approach.

Results

We identified first-year implementation challenges in five thematic areas: 1) program design, 2) vendor experience, 3) engagement/communication, 4) reaction/satisfaction of stakeholders, and 5) processing/returning of mailed kits. Commonly experienced challenges by both health plans related to the time-consuming nature of the programs to set up, and complexities and delays in working with vendors. We found implementation successes in the same five thematic areas as well as four additional areas of: 1) leadership support, 2) compatibility with the health plan, 3) broader impacts, and 4) collaboration with researchers. Commonly experienced successes included the ability to adapt the mailed FIT program to the individual health plan culture and needs, and the synchronicity between the programs and their organizational missions and goals.

Conclusions

Both health plans successfully adapted mailed FIT programs to their own culture and resources and used their strong quality management resources to maximize success in overcoming the time demands of setting up the program and working with their vendors. Mailed FIT programs administered by health plans, especially those serving Medicaid- and dual eligible Medicaid/Medicare-insured populations, may be an important resource to support closing gaps in colorectal cancer screening among traditionally underserved populations.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

Two Medicaid health plans’ models and motivations for improving colorectal cancer screening rates

Authors:

Jennifer K Coury, Jennifer L Schneider, Beverly B Green, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Amanda F Petrik, Jennifer S Rivelli, Malaika R Schwartz, & Gloria D Coronado

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: February 2020

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Translational Behavioral Medicine