Skip to content

✪ Identifying Community-Sourced Implementation Strategies for Delivering a Task-Shared Mental Health Intervention for Fathers in Kenya

Authors:

Ali Giusto, Florence Jaguga, Michaela Greenlee, Noah Triplett, Wilter Rono, Hani Rukh-E-Qamar, Mercy Korir, Dan Aburi, Milton Wainberg

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Research and Practice

Abstract:

Background

To design accessible interventions, understanding how best to implement them in context is essential. Strategies that reflect community perspectives may be most relevant and impactful. This study aimed to identify and specify community-sourced implementation strategies for delivering a mental health and alcohol use intervention for fathers in Kenya and to map them to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy.

Method

In Eldoret, Kenya, focus groups (seven groups; 31 participants) and key informant interviews (n = 18) were conducted with hospital leaders, policymakers, mental health providers, community leaders, fathers, lay providers, patients, and men currently experiencing mental health and alcohol use challenges. Data were analyzed using the framework method to generate high-level codes, followed by a second phase to extract, specify, and review implementation strategies.

Results

Community members identified lay providers recruited from the community as a promising delivery approach, with professional providers contributing to linkage to care and support for more acute needs. Engagement of community leaders and leveraging existing infrastructure were seen as key to enhancing implementation and reach, particularly among men. Multiple delivery settings (e.g., church, hospital, school) were considered acceptable depending on patient preference. A total of 25 unique community-sourced strategies were identified: three directly matched ERIC strategies, 19 were adapted, and two were unique to the community context.

Conclusions

This study identified locally grounded implementation strategies to guide early-stage intervention delivery for fathers in Kenya. Findings contribute to the growing body of implementation science in non-Western contexts and highlight a participatory approach for identifying and specifying strategies relevant to local systems and populations.

Plain Language Summary

This study explored how to deliver mental health and alcohol use treatment to Kenyan fathers based on community and father input. Key strategies included using local helpers, familiar spaces, and engaging leaders. Findings emphasize co-design and context-based delivery to make interventions more accessible, relevant, and ready for testing.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Towards a decolonising implementation science: principles from Indigenous leadership

Authors:

Christopher G Kemp, Lauren White, Emily E HaroZ & Prof Donald Warne

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: December 2026

Read the full text in the open access journal Lancet Global Health

Abstract:

Summary

Implementation science is a diverse and evolving field that draws on multiple epistemologies and methods. However, the dominant foundations of implementation science remain settler colonial, biomedical, and positivist. In Indigenous and other marginalised settings, these foundations can result in poor epistemological, ethical, and practical fit. We argue that a paradigm shift that is grounded in Indigenous values, sovereignty, relationality, and epistemologies is needed. We propose seven guiding principles for a decolonising implementation science. Drawing from emerging scholarship and innovative Indigenous-led frameworks from the USA, Aotearoa New Zealand, and Australia, these principles centre sovereignty, strengths-based approaches, and relational accountability. These principles also offer a roadmap to redefine rigour, expand what counts as evidence, and ensure genuine community control over the research process. Although born from Indigenous experience, these principles provide a framework for transforming implementation science to be more just, equitable, and effective for marginalised communities globally.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Exploring implementation strategies in evidence-based open streets programs for promoting physical activity in the Americas: a scoping review

Authors:

Raúl D. Gierbolini-Rivera, Milena Franco Silva, Milena Franco Silva, Lorna Fabiola Pineda, Bryan J. Weiner, Byron J. Powell, Ross C. Brownson & Diana C. Parra

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: November 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:

Background

Chronic diseases are a leading public health concern in the Americas, and physical inactivity contributes significantly to their burden. Open streets program—community initiatives that temporarily close urban streets to vehicles—promote physical activity and community engagement, demonstrating positive health and social impacts. Effective implementation depends on identifying suitable strategies and frameworks. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy, developed for clinical/healthcare contexts, has not been widely assessed for community-based interventions such as Open Streets. Implementation strategies could lead to specific outcomes (e.g., adoption, sustainability) that differ from program outcomes (e.g., PA levels, chronic disease prevalence). This scoping review focuses on the strategies that influence implementation outcomes. The primary aims of this review were to (1) identify implementation strategies for Open Streets programs and (2) identify opportunities for Open Streets programs to promote chronic disease prevention and physical activity, specifically in the Americas.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Web of Science, TRIS, and LILACS) were searched for studies on Open Streets programs in the Americas (January 2004–April 2024). Three reviewers independently screened studies in Rayyan. Strategies were extracted and coded according to the 73 ERIC taxonomy strategies. Quality appraisal used MMAT for empirical studies, AMSTAR-2 for reviews, and AACODS for gray literature.

Results

Fifty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 63 distinct implementation strategies for Open Streets programs. All 63 strategies were classified within the ERIC taxonomy. Frequently aligned ERIC strategies included building coalitions, capturing local knowledge, conducting needs assessments, and fostering stakeholder engagement. Open Streets strategies emphasized multisectoral collaboration, cultural adaptation, equity, and sustainability.

Discussion

Among the 63 identified Open Streets strategies, many aligned with ERIC, providing a foundation in stakeholder engagement, coalition building, and flexible, context-sensitive implementation. However, several ERIC strategies were not relevant to Open Streets, underscoring that while many ERIC strategies were applicable, not all suited this setting. Open Streets programs may require supplemental approaches to address equity, cultural competence, and multisectoral collaboration. Findings present opportunities to tailor, test, and scale strategies that maximize the population health impact of Open Streets and similar community-based programs.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ When evidence is not enough: A qualitative exploration of healthcare workers’ perspectives on expansion of two-way texting (2wT) for post- circumcision follow-up in South Africa

Authors:

Isabella Fabens, Calsile Makhele, Nelson Igaba, Khumbulani Moyo, Felex Ndebele, Jacqueline Pienaar, Geoffrey Setswe, & Caryl Feldacker

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: June 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal PLOS Digital Health

Abstract:

As per South African national guidelines, in-person follow-up visits after voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) are required but may be unnecessary. Two-way texting (2wT), an mHealth platform, engages clients in post-operative care and triages those with complications to in-person review. 2wT was found to be safe, effective, and efficient. In South Africa, to understand provider perspectives on 2wT and potential for expansion, 20 key informant interviews were conducted with management, clinicians, data officials and support staff involved in 2wT scale-up. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative methods and informed by two implementation science frameworks: the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and the Pragmatic, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). Participants shared mixed and multi-faceted feedback, including that 2wT improves monitoring and evaluation of clients and clinical outcomes while also reducing follow-up visits. Challenges included duplicative routine and 2wT reporting systems and perceptions that 2wT increased workload. To improve the likelihood of successful 2wT scale-up in routine VMMC settings, participants suggested: further 2wT sensitization to ensure clinician and support staff buy-in; a dedicated clinician or nurse to manage telehealth clients; improved dashboards to better visualize 2wT client data; mobilizing 2wT champions at facilities to garner support for 2wT as routine care; and updating VMMC guidelines to support VMMC telehealth. As attendance at follow-up visits may not be as high as reported, implementing 2wT may require more effort but also brings added benefits of client verification and documented follow-up. The transition from research to routine practice is challenging, but use of RE-AIM and PRISM indicate that it is not impossible. As VMMC funding is decreasing, more effort to share the evidence base for 2wT as a safe, cost-effective, high-quality approach for VMMC follow-up is needed to encourage widespread uptake and adoption.

Author summary

South Africa has a high prevalence of HIV, and voluntary medical male circumcision is a prevention method recommended by the World Health Organization. Two-way texting (2wT) is a digital health intervention that allows males to receive educational messages after circumcision about healing and send messages directly to a provider via SMS or WhatsApp. This system detects as many complications as routine follow-up care, though is more efficient. As we scale up to new locations in South Africa, we wanted to ensure the approach is well-adapted for health workers. Through 20 interviews with health workers, we found that it saves clients in-person visits and helps with data collection. However, more effort is needed to introduce the intervention to clinicians, including providing better training and appointing champions to help motivate clinicians. Funding for HIV and VMMC programs is decreasing, so it is important to find tools such as digital health to reduce the burden on facilities while maintaining quality client care.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Mental health policy implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol

Authors:

Rangarirai Matima, Claire van der Westhuizen, Crick Lund, Ferdinand C. Mukumbang

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal PLOS One

Abstract:

Introduction

Formulating and implementing mental health policy is foundational to public mental health. The implementation of mental health policy varies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with some countries having better implementation outcomes than others. Low implementation poses challenges relating to addressing the high burden and wide treatment gaps of mental health conditions. While different implementation strategies are applied to implement mental health policy in different contexts, there is little knowledge of what category of strategies are being used and how and why their implementation produces varied outcomes. To this end, we propose to conduct a realist synthesis to explain how, why, for whom, and under what health system conditions certain policy implementation strategies work or not in LMICs.

Methods and analysis

This paper will detail the protocol on conducting a realist review of the literature on mental health policy implementation in LMICs. Realist reviews/syntheses are theory-driven reviews designed to formulate and test (confirm, refute, or refine) initial programme theories to explain how, why, for whom and under what contexts a programme, intervention or policy works as intended or not. Theory is built by exploring and abstracting context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations in the data. These CMO configurations are identified through retroductive theorizing, a mechanism-centred approach to theory development. We will adopt these steps to guide the process of realist synthesis: i) identify the research question, clarifying the scope of the review and formulating the initial programme theory (ii) conducting background searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Africa-Wide Information, African Index Medicus (AIM), CINAHL and Scopus databases, and grey literature (iii) appraising the quality of studies and data extraction and (iv) synthesising data.

Registration

The review is part of a realist evaluation exploring mental health policy implementation in LMICs and is registered under PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024580312). Findings will inform the development of initial mental health policy implementation programme theories explaining why and how mental health policy implementation in LMICs works.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Mechanism-Based Middle-Range Theories: Using Realist Syntheses to Reconcile Specificity to Context and Generalizability

Authors:

Ferdinand C. Mukumbang and Geoff Wong

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: March 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal Qualitative Health Research

Abstract:

Realist synthesis is a recognized methodological approach to evidence synthesis to inform evidence-based health policy and practice. The implicit assumption behind research synthesis is that the evidence it generates should be generalizable––drawing broad inferences from specific observations. While this understanding is generally shared among social scientists, tensions exist between having generalizable evidence and how this evidence can be useful in specific contexts. This paper considers the role of mechanism-based middle-range theories obtained from realist synthesis in bridging specificity to context and generalizability. Retroductive theorizing in realist synthesis helps to identify ideas about mechanisms related to the phenomenon embedded in the social and organizational contexts that could, in principle, have a much broader application. Also, because mechanism-based middle-range theories are linked to contextual features, they capture contextual nuances to enhance evidence implementation. We conclude that middle-range mechanisms provide an opportunity to achieve generalizability and contextualization in implementation science.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ A framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials for digital health interventions

Authors:

Theresa E. Matson, Eric D.A. Hermes, Aaron R. Lyon, Andrew Quanbeck, Stephen M. Schueller, Sarah M. Wilson, and Joseph E. Glass

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: February 2025

Read the full text open access in the journal Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract:

This article proposes methods for designing randomized controlled trials studying the implementation and effectiveness of digital interventions, meaning websites or applications ("apps") that patients use in healthcare. Deploying digital interventions for behavioral health differs from implementing traditional interventions such as medications or human-delivered therapy. Prior trial design guidance has ignored the existence of international governmental evidence standards, has paid insufficient attention to implementation reporting guidelines, and has not described methods for empirically testing the approach for organizing the delivery of digital interventions.

This framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of digital behavioral health interventions helps researchers articulate research questions that matter to decision-makers and meaningfully contribute to implementation. The framework outlines three phases: 1) frame effectiveness and implementation questions in terms of the digital intervention components, types of clinical support for the digital intervention, and specific strategies for implementing the digital intervention; 2) define and delineate actors, activities, action targets, dose, temporality, and outcomes to maximize inference and reproducibility; and 3) specify trial design features used for hybrid classification.

We illustrate the utility of this framework with two effectiveness-implementation studies of digital interventions for substance use. This framework can help researchers decide on appropriate methodology and help decision-makers apply findings.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

The difference-making role of staff support in implementing nurse care management for opioid use disorder treatment: A configurational analysis

Authors:

Theresa E Matson, Amy K Lee, Edward J Miech, Paige D Wartko, Rebecca C Phillps, Mary Shea, Andrea Altschuler, Aimee N C Campbell, Colleen T Labelle, Julia H Arnsten, Jordan M Braciszewski, Joseph E Glass, Viviana E Horigian, Mark T Murphy, Mohammad Zare-Mehrjerdi, and Katharine A Bradley

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: February 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment

✪ Human-Centered Design of an mHealth Tool for Optimizing HIV Index Testing in Wartime Ukraine: Formative Research Case Study

Authors:

Nancy Puttkammer, Elizabeth Dunbar, Myroslava Germanovych, Mariia Rosol, Matthew Golden, Anna Hubashova, Vladyslav Fedorchenko, Larisa Hetman, Liudmyla Legkostup, Jan Flowers, and Olena Nesterova

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: January 2025

Read the full text in the open access journal JMIR Formative Research

Abstract:

Background

Assisted partner services (APSs; sometimes called index testing) are now being brought to scale as a high-yield HIV testing strategy in many nations. However, the success of APSs is often hampered by low levels of partner elicitation. The Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (CASI)–Plus study sought to develop and test a mobile health (mHealth) tool to increase the elicitation of sexual and needle-sharing partners among persons with newly diagnosed HIV. CASI-Plus provides client-facing information on APS methods and uses a standardized, self-guided questionnaire with nonjudgmental language for clients to list partners who would benefit from HIV testing. The tool also enables health care workers (HCWs) to see summarized data to facilitate partner tracking.

Objective

The formative research phase of the CASI-Plus study aimed to gather client and HCW input on the design of the CASI-Plus tool to ensure its acceptability, feasibility, and usability.

Methods

This study gathered input to prioritize features and tested the usability of CASI-Plus with HCWs and clients receiving HIV services in public health clinics in wartime Ukraine. The CASI-Plus study’s formative phase, carried out from May 2023 to July 2024, adapted human-centered design (HCD) methods grounded in principles of empathy, iteration, and creative ideation. The study involved 3 steps: formative HCD, including in-depth individual interviews with clients, such as men who have sex with men and people who inject drugs, and internet-based design workshops with HCWs from rural and urban HIV clinics in Chernihiv and Dnipro; software platform assessment and heuristic evaluation, including assessment of open-source mHealth platforms against CASI-Plus requirements, prototype development, and testing of the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) prototype based on usability heuristics; and usability walk-throughs, including simulated cases with HCWs and clients.

Results:

The formative phase of the CASI-Plus study included in-depth individual interviews with 10 clients and 3 workshops with 22 HCWs. This study demonstrated how simplified HCD methods, adapted to the wartime context, gathered rich input on prioritized features and tool design. The CASI-Plus design reflected features that are both culturally sensitive and in alignment with the constraints of Ukraine’s wartime setting. Prioritized features included information about the benefits of HIV index testing; a nonjudgmental, self-guided questionnaire to report partners; client stories; and bright images to accompany the text. Two-way SMS text messaging between clients and HCWs was deemed impractical based on risks of privacy breaches, national patient privacy regulations, and HCW workload./p>

Conclusions

It was feasible to conduct HCD research in Ukraine in a wartime setting. The CASI-Plus mHealth tool was acceptable to both HCWs and clients. The next step for this research is a randomized clinical trial of the effect of the REDCap-based CASI-Plus tool on the number of partners named and the rate of partners completing HIV testing.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**

✪ Balancing realist review outputs with the needs of policymakers and practitioners

Authors:

Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Sonja Klingberg, & Bipin Adhikari

University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.

✪ Open Access

Published: October 2024

Read the full text in the open access journal Health Policy and Planning

Abstract:

A realist review is a theory-driven approach to synthesizing evidence based on the realist philosophy of science. Realist reviews are conducted to provide the policy and practice community with a rich, detailed and practical understanding of complex social interventions that will likely be of much more use to them when planning and implementing programmes. Robust realist reviews must balance philosophical engagement, methodological rigour and relevance to practice. Nevertheless, they have been criticized for being more philosophically inclined and less methodologically robust, with findings that have little implication for practice. Using the philosophy/epistemology➔ methodology➔ theory➔ practice concept flow, we report how we balanced philosophical principles and practical insights in a recently conducted realist review on participatory practices that impact the benefits of non-communicable disease research and interventions in low- and middle-income countries. If realist reviews are not comprehensible enough for these practitioners, their utility and relevance may suffer from being limited to a specialist cohort of academics. We propose that realist review findings and outputs must be framed and communicated to meaningfully engage practitioners without undertaking translational efforts.

**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**