Emily C. Williams, Madeline C. Frost, Olivia V. Fletcher, Carol E. Achtmeyer, Jessica A. Chen, Rachel L. Bachrach, E. Jennifer Edelman, Bryan J. Weiner, George N. Ioannou, and Judith I. Tsui
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: August 2026
Ermyas Birru, Aneth Dinis, Jonny Crocker, Quinhas Fernandes, Sarah Gimbel, Steve Gloyd, Artur Gremu, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Isaías Ramiro, Stelio Tembe, Orvalho Augusto & Kenneth Sherr
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: March 2026
Despite high coverage of facility-based maternal and child health (MCH) services in Mozambique, preventable maternal and neonatal deaths remain among the highest globally. To address this, the Integrated District Evidence-to-Action (IDEAs) program was implemented from 2016 to 2020 in central Mozambique as a facility-level Audit and Feedback (A&F) strategy. IDEAs adapted traditional A&F into three components: 1) biannual facility readiness assessments, 2) A&F meetings to develop action plans, and 3) supportive supervision with funding for implementation. This study estimates total and component-specific implementation costs of IDEAs and compares them to average district health budgets.
Costs were estimated from a payer perspective following CHEERS guidelines, using both Gross and Microcosting methods. Costs were annualized over five years (2016–2020) with a 3% discount rate and are reported in 2020 USD. Staff time estimates were based on program staff consultations and national salary data. Outcomes include average cost per district and total annual cost by intervention component. We conducted a deterministic sensitivity analysis to identify cost drivers with the most significant impact on the overall cost.
The IDEAs programs total (2016–2020) incurred total costs were $2,224,341 (2020 USD), with $1,702,648 (76.5%) for recurrent expenses and $495,323 (22.3%) for Capital expenses. Average annual district-level costs were $41,967, including A&F meetings ($10,893; 26.0%), Capital expenditures ($8255; 19.7%), targeted support ($9323; 22.2%) which includes $5700 (13.6%) for district-level cash transfers and $3623 (8.6%) for facility supervision, and readiness assessments ($6351; 15.1%).Per diems accounted for 52.0% of A&F meeting costs. IDEAs represented approximately 6.6% of the average district health budget. Implementation involved 33 participants with 2560 h yearly per district. Capital expenses were highly sensitive to when applying a standard 25% increase or decrease compared to other cost categories.
Our findings offer practical guidance for district-level planners to adapt and scale IDEAs. Policymakers and donors should integrate recurring costs into budgets and explore cost-saving strategies like virtual tools or streamlined meetings to improve sustainability. Future research must assess long-term integration into government programs and test alternative approaches across diverse low-resource settings to guide scaling.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Gavin Allman, Sumithra Krishnamurthy Reddiar, Carrie Ngongo, Meritxell Mallafré-Larrosa, Cristina Parsons Perez, Helen McGuire, Roberto F. Iunes, Andrea Vassalotti, Kyle Peterson & Rachel Nugent
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: November 2025
Public-private partnerships have the potential to advance solutions to complex dilemmas such as the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Knowledge creation, trust, and social capital among partners – encapsulated in the term “connective tissue” – are key considerations for the cohesion and sustainability of multisectoral collaborative efforts in global health.
A survey was conducted with 23 stakeholders of projects in four countries supported by Access Accelerated, a collective of biopharmaceutical and life sciences companies. The survey elicited perspectives on the factors that strengthen collaboration and develop knowledge creation, trust, and social capital within the multisectoral partner network.
Survey respondents related how connective tissue was cultivated through implementation of multiple projects with shared goals. Identified barriers to effective collaboration included resource constraints, while facilitators included shared objectives and overlapping activities. Qualitative responses provide deeper understanding of how multisectoral collaboration contributed to the sustainability of the Access Accelerated initiative.
Measurement of connective tissue enhances understanding of project performance by addressing dynamic and previously overlooked outcomes of multisectoral collaboration. Multisectoral health initiatives can incorporate implementation science methods into measurement approaches to strengthen connective tissue among partners and stakeholders.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Juan Macalupu, Elsa González-Lagos, Sarah Gimbel, & Eduardo Gotuzzo
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: August 2025
In the Peruvian Amazon, a significant proportion of replacement blood donors test reactive for HIV, HTLV-1/2, and other transfusion-transmissible infections but often receive no subsequent care. Optimizing healthcare for these individuals can mitigate adverse outcomes by enabling early diagnosis and management. Effective coordination between Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services is essential to provide comprehensive care. To address this challenge, this study applies an Implementation Science approach to design and assess an innovation that enhances healthcare for blood donors affected by transfusion-transmissible infections. A pre-implementation mixed methods study will be conducted at two hospitals in the Peruvian Amazon, employing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a systems engineering tool (mapping). The study will focus on the inner setting domain of CFIR and map the care continuum to identify contextual determinants that may influence implementation. It has three specific aims planned for the future: first, to use a convergent mixed methods approach to examine the care continuum of blood donors and the inner settings; second, to co-design an innovation through qualitative and participatory methods, integrating Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services via the hospital information management system; and third, to evaluate the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of the co-designed innovation through a pilot. Replacement blood donation and fragmented healthcare systems are common challenges in other low- and middle-income countries. The findings of this study can inform future implementation research and policy in similar settings.
Main findings: This study will co-design and pilot an innovation to improve how blood donors at risk of transfusion-transmissible infections receive screening results, confirmatory testing, and care, by integrating Blood Bank and Infectious Diseases services through digital tools.
Added knowledge: This study employs a participatory, mixed-methods implementation science approach to systematically assess and address gaps in blood donor healthcare, providing a scalable methodology while ensuring context-specific, actionable interventions for resource-limited settings.
Global health impact for policy and action: This study will drive digital innovations in blood donor healthcare to strengthen blood safety and infectious disease control, while framing a pragmatic, adaptable approach for integrating fragmented healthcare systems in resource-limited settings.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Cam Escoffery, Juzhong Sun, Amy DeGroff, Krishna Sharma, Manal Masud, Thuy Vu, Dara Schlueter & Peggy Hannon
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: July 2025
CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) aims to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening prevalence by implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in health system clinics partnering with the program. Program champions, as one of the key program components, are expected to facilitate the implementation of EBIs and support desired changes in many ways. Given limited information about the champions in clinical systems, this study investigated champion types, roles, and sustainability within the CRCCP.
This mixed methods, cross-sectional study included a survey of 205 respondents (health system and clinic staff) representing 303 clinics and 12 qualitative interviews of CRCCP award recipients and partnering clinics. The survey assessed clinic characteristics, EBI implementation, information about program champions, and sustainability. Interview topics included champion roles, benefits, turnover, and maintenance.
Champions worked at either the health system or clinic level. Among health systems, champions were quality improvement (QI) managers (48.5%), physicians (36.4%), or high-level administrators (27.3%). In clinics, champions were physicians (37.0%), QI managers (26.1%) or medical assistants (23.9%). Champions in both health systems and clinics were most often assigned the role (45.5% and 45.7%, respectively); yet clinic champions were more likely to naturally emerge than health system champions (26.1% vs. 15.2%). Among naturally emerging champions, 64.3% experienced zero turnover, more than for assigned champions. While champions in both groups received training, more champions in health systems reported being trained than those in clinics (75.8% vs 52.2%). No significant differences in EBIs implemented were observed between those clinics with and without a champion. Zero champion turnover was associated with great or very great leadership support (68.9%), program adaptation (60.7%) and organizational capacity (54.1%). Interviews found that champions’ roles included advocating for CRC screening, providing technical assistance for EBI implementation, creating organizational policies for CRC screening, and overseeing QI. Interviewees reported a desire to address champion sustainability.
These findings inform the use of program champions for clinic-based public health programs. Naturally emerging champions were more stable than those assigned the role.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Shari S. Rogal, Brittney Neely, Monica Merante, Karen Slazinski, Lorenzo McFarland, Christina Brodkorb, Jada Cooper, Carolyn Lamorte, Sandra Gibson, Emily Comstock, Jamie Morano, Marissa Maier, Lauren A. Beste, Karine Rozenberg, Maggie Chartier, Matthew J. Chinman, David Ross & Vera Yakovchenko
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: June 2025
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) dramatically reduces the likelihood of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), yet it remains under-prescribed, particularly for people in communities with high HIV incidence. While implementation science and health services researchers aim to address disparities in care, few interventions have proven effective in doing so. We aimed to identify implementation strategies associated with higher PrEP prescribing rates and pilot test a tailored intervention as a proof-of-concept in a single Veterans Health Administration (VA) facility.
VA clinicians were surveyed using an instrument derived from the Evidence-based Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy to assess the use of various strategies for PrEP in fiscal years 2019–2021. Correlational analyses identified the strategies associated with the frequency of PrEP prescribing and semi-structured interviews with personnel from 11 VA medical facilities with high PrEP prescribing refined and manualized these strategies into the Getting to Implementation (GTI)-PrEP playbook. The playbook was subsequently pilot tested in a VA facility with high new HIV diagnosis rates and low PrEP prescribing rates.
The clinician survey collected 157 responses from 95 unique VA facilities on implementation strategy use. Analysis identified eight strategies significantly associated with PrEP prescribing, including: networking, clinician education, clinical support tools, dashboard utilization, telehealth, pharmacist involvement, direct patient engagement, and enhanced sexual health history taking. In the pilot study, the site completed the GTI-PrEP Playbook with high fidelity and newly implemented seven of the eight strategies, achieving a 363% increase in PrEP prescribing rates among Black Veterans over the one-year period.
This multi-year national evaluation identified a core subset of effective implementation strategies for increasing PrEP prescribing. The process of empirically specifying these strategies and pilot testing them through the GTI-PrEP playbook demonstrates a promising, data-driven approach to improve PrEP prescribing rates and reduce racial disparities in HIV prevention.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
K. M. Sileo, R. K. Wanyenze, A. Anecho, R. L. Luttinen, K. Weston, B. Mukasa, S. C. Mukama, S. H. Vermund, S. L. Dworkin, J. F. Dovidio, B. S. Taylor & T. S. Kershaw
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: May 2025
Health workers play a critical role in providing gender-sensitive HIV care. However, without adequate training, they may inadvertently reinforce negative gender norms that hinder engagement in care. To improve ART services in sub-Saharan Africa, effective implementation strategies, including trainings, are essential.
This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel 4-session, gender-sensitivity training for HIV health and lay workers in rural and peri-urban Uganda. We conducted a pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial in 2022–23, utilizing data from three sources: process data from 144 providers and 238 clients, qualitative post-intervention focus groups and interviews with 53 training attendees, and stakeholder interviews with 12 community leaders and facilitators. We employed thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
The training was highly rated by attendees via brief post-session surveys, with 99% of sessions deemed satisfactory. Qualitative feedback indicated that the sessions were perceived as appropriate for addressing providers’ gaps in delivering gender-sensitive care and as beneficial for participants. High feasibility was evidenced by 100% of intervention steps delivered (fidelity checklists), 86% attendance (attendance logs), and 98.6% and 94.8% recruitment of eligible providers and clients (study records), respectively. Through qualitative exit focus groups, factors that positively affected acceptability and feasibility included tactics to gain support from supervisors, the use of experienced facilitators and active learning approaches, and the consideration of the health system context in delivery (e.g., cadre mix, location). Suggested improvements encompassed addressing interpersonal and structural barriers to client-centered care, incorporating community sensitization, streamlining content, and enhancing mentorship follow-ups. Stakeholders recognized the training’s alignment with national health priorities and emphasized the need for clarity regarding its integration with existing training curricula and ongoing stakeholder engagement.
This study underscores the acceptability and feasibility of a gender-sensitivity training program for HIV providers; further evaluation of the program is warranted. Identified factors influencing implementation can inform enhancements to gender-focused training initiatives to improve the quality of HIV services and enhance client engagement and health outcomes.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Scott Halliday, Lydia A. Chwastiak, Kaitlin Zinsli, Ramona Emerson, Teagan Wood, Meena S. Ramchandani, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I. Tsui, Bradley H. Wagenaar, Deepa Rao, & Julia C. Dombrowski
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: May 2025
Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers to care, but the walk-in model poses challenges to integrating behavioral health services. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of depression and opioid use disorder in a low-barrier clinic.
In a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study, we accessed data from patient records to generate a care cascade for the number of patients enrolled in the first six months of the program and conducted individual interviews with patients and staff to interpret the care cascade findings.
Among 175 patients who visited the clinic, 36% were screened for, 24% were referred to, 15% completed an intake for, and 9% engaged in CoCM. The interviews revealed that screening was limited by a lack of clarity among staff about services offered in CoCM, staff forgetting the screening process, and limited time during patent visits. Referrals were limited by low buy-in among staff and patient complexity. Intakes were limited by time and space constraints in the care setting and competing acute patient needs. The care manager’s ability to embody the clinic’s culture facilitated engagement among patients who completed intakes.
Staff perceived CoCM to be acceptable and feasible to implement, but only in the context of multiple barriers to implementation and challenges to systematic screening and measurement-based care.
Not applicable.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**
Hannah E. Frank, Nima Sarani, Jacqueline F. Hayes, Ruben G. Martinez, Jessyca Goldstein, Laura Evans, Gary Phillips, R. Phillip Dellinger, David Portelli, Christa Schorr, Kathleen M. Terry, Lori Harmon, Sean Townsend & Mitchell M. Levy
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: May 2026
Christine M Khosropour, Arianna Rubin Means, Roxanne P Kerani, Emma M Murphy, Krupa Mehta, Kristina Santana, Kenneth Sherr, & Matthew R Golden.
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
Published: April 2025