Analyzing the process of translating research into practice

In the context of implementation science, an adaptation refers to a change or modification made to a program or strategy. These adaptations can be either intentional (planned) or unplanned. They occur to align the intervention with the specific context in which it is being implemented. Whether premeditated or spontaneous, adaptations play a crucial role in achieving desired outcomes while considering the unique needs of diverse populations.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying adaptation across contexts.

Barriers and facilitators refer to factors that influence the successful adoption and integration of evidence-based practices. Examples include resource limitations, organizational structure, leadership strength and influential EBP champions.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation across contexts.

Context refers to the specific conditions, settings, and circumstances in which an evidence-based practice is implemented. It encompasses various factors that influence the success or failure of implementing an EBP within a particular organization, community, or system.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying how context impacts implementation across contexts.

De-implementation refers to the process of reducing or stopping the use of services, practices, or interventions that are ineffective, unproven, harmful, overused, or inappropriate. It involves discontinuing existing practices or initiatives that no longer constitute best-practices across contexts.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying deimplementation.

Health equity is the state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health. This concept involves addressing and eliminating disparities in health outcomes that are systematically associated with social, economic, and environmental disadvantages. Achieving health equity requires removing obstacles to health such as poverty, discrimination, and their consequences, including lack of access to good jobs, quality education, and safe environments.

In implementation science, health equity is assessed by examining how interventions impact different populations, particularly those who are marginalized or disadvantaged. Researchers use frameworks and models that incorporate equity-focused domains to identify and address barriers to equitable implementation. This involves analyzing data to understand disparities in access, quality, and outcomes of health interventions. By integrating health equity considerations into the design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions, implementation science aims to ensure that all populations benefit equally from health innovations.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying health equity in implementation across contexts.

Implementation climate is a shared perception among intended users of an innovation within an organization. It reflects the extent to which an organization’s implementation policies and practices encourage, cultivate, and reward the use of that innovation. Ultimately, it’s about how well an organization supports and expects the adoption of new practices or interventions. The stronger the implementation climate, the more consistent and high-quality the innovation use tends to be within the organization.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying implementation climate.

Implementation leadership in the field of implementation science refers to the strategic guidance provided by leaders within an organization to effectively adopt and integrate evidence-based practices (EBPs). Successful EBP implementation relies on leadership that fosters a supportive environment because leaders influence organizational culture, resource allocation, and staff engagement.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying implementation leadership across contexts.

Organizational climate in the field of implementation science refers to employees’ collective appraisal of the organizational work environment, taking into account many dimensions of the situation as well as the psychological impact of the environment. Job-specific properties such as role clarity, workload and other aspects unique to a person’s specific job have a psychological impact that can be agreed upon by members of the organization. Work group or team cooperation and effectiveness as well as leadership and organizational support are other dimensions of shared experience that factor into organizational climate.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying organizational climate across contexts.

Organizational culture in implementation science refers to the shared values, beliefs, norms, and practices within an organization. It shapes how people interact, make decisions, and approach their work. In the context of implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs), organizational culture influences whether EBPs align with the organization’s values and mission, how information flows and how open employees are to change, how leaders model and reinforce desired behaviors, and whether the organization encourages continuous improvement.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying organizational culture across contexts.

Organizational readiness for change is a crucial concept in implementation science. It refers to the degree to which an organization and its members are primed, motivated, and capable of executing a change. Factors influencing organizational readiness include how much the change is valued and the appraisal of three key determinants: task demands, resource availability, and situational factors. When readiness is high, members are more likely to initiate, persist, and cooperate, leading to effective implementation.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying organizational readiness across contexts.

Pragmatism in implementation science involves practical problem-solving and a blend of perspectives. It emphasizes creating a model of explanation based on a multi-case, multi-method body of evidence rather than relying solely on narrow randomized-control trials.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying pragmatism in implementation across contexts.

Scale-up is the process of expanding the use of evidence-based practices to reach larger populations or new delivery systems. When EBPs are adapted to new populations or delivery systems, it’s called “scaling-out.” The goal is to achieve similar benefits as seen in previous studies, even in novel contexts. Scaling up complex health interventions isn’t straightforward; intentional efforts are needed. Without guided scaling, it can take years for a new EBI to be broadly implemented. Successful scale-up involves thoughtful planning, adaptation, and empirical evaluation.

Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying organizational implementation scale-up across contexts.

Usability refers to the extent to which an intervention or implementation strategy can be used by specified individuals to achieve specific goals effectively, efficiently, and satisfactorily within a particular context. It involves assessing how easy and practical it is for users to adopt and integrate the intervention into their routine practices.

Implementation science ensures that evidence-based practices are effectively adopted and integrated into real-world settings. Without this bridge, promising research findings might not reach those who need them. Implementation science drives evidence-based practice, improves service delivery, and ultimately enhances the well-being of individuals and communities.

Browse the articles below to see why UW researchers believe implementation science is valuable to their health and human services focus area.