The Library:
View Articles by Methodology & Measurement
Improving Health Outcomes Through Rigorous Science
Studying methodology and measurement in implementation science is fundamental for ensuring that research findings are translated into practice effectively, reliably, and sustainably. It supports the continuous advancement of the field and ultimately contributes to better health outcomes.
While the field of implementation science is making significant strides, there is still much work to be done to refine methodologies and improve the reliability and validity of measurement tools. This ongoing development is crucial for advancing the science and ensuring that research findings are effectively translated into practice. The field faces challenges in standardizing measures due to a lack of linguistic consensus and clarity in operationalizing constructs which makes it difficult to compare results across studies. There is also often ambiguity in defining and measuring constructs borrowed from other fields (like psychology) leading to implementation studies frequently lacking clear descriptions of how such constructs are measured and analyzed.
There is a growing emphasis in the field on evaluating the psychometric properties of measures used in implementation science. Many measures have been developed on demand for specific studies, but they often lack rigorous evaluation to ensure they accurately measure what they intend to. Efforts are underway to improve the quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. This includes developing standardized definitions, validated measurement approaches, and causal models.
Overall, while the field of implementation science is making significant strides, there is still much work to be done to refine methodologies and improve the reliability and validity of measurement tools. This ongoing development is crucial for advancing the science and ensuring that research findings are effectively translated into practice.
Below, you can explore articles in our Library to see examples of methodology and measurement development in implementation science across a range of journals. Open access articles are marked with the ✪ symbol.
Validated measurement tools enhance the quality of research by ensuring that findings are reliable and can be replicated, which is essential for building a robust evidence base. Standardized measures allow for comparisons across different studies and contexts. This standardization is key to generalizing findings and understanding what works best in various settings. As implementation science deals with complex, real-world environments, robust measurement tools help capture this complexity and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing implementation.
Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying and improving measurement in implementation science across contexts.
✪ Measuring characteristics of individuals: An updated systematic review of instruments’ psychometric properties
✪ Assessing the usability of complex psychosocial interventions: The Intervention Usability Scale
✪ Measuring readiness for implementation: A systematic review of measures’ psychometric and pragmatic properties
✪ Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures’ psychometric properties
Development of a Wellness Committee Implementation Index for Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Small Businesses
Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS)
Pragmatic measurement in implementation science refers to the development and use of measures that are not only scientifically rigorous but also practical and feasible for real-world settings. Key aspects of pragmatic measurement tools are acceptability, compatibility, ease of use, and usefulness.
Acceptability: Measures should be acceptable to stakeholders, including practitioners and patients, ensuring they are willing to use them.
Compatibility: The measures should fit well within the existing workflows and systems of the settings where they are implemented.
Ease of Use: They should be easy to administer, interpret, and integrate into routine practice without requiring extensive training or resources.
Usefulness: Measures should provide valuable information that can inform decision-making and improve implementation processes and outcomes.
These criteria help ensure that the measures are not only valid and reliable but also practical for use in diverse, real-world environments.
Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying and improving pragmatic measurement in implementation science across contexts.
Factors Affecting Post-trial Sustainment or De-implementation of Study Interventions: A Narrative Review
✪ Integrating HPV self-collect into primary care to address cervical cancer screening disparities
✪ Dissemination and implementation analysis of the Ross procedure in adults: Time to update the guidelines?
✪ Econometric evaluation of implementing a behavioral health integration intervention in primary care settings
Methodology in implementation science is unique because it focuses on understanding and improving the processes and strategies used to integrate evidence-based practices into real-world settings. To do this, implementation science often employs a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to capture a comprehensive view of how interventions are adopted and sustained. Various theories, models, and frameworks guide the research process, including process models to describe and guide the translation of research into practice, determinant frameworks to understand what influences implementation outcomes, and evaluation frameworks to assess the implementation.
The methodology used in this field emphasizes the importance of context, recognizing that interventions may need to be adapted to fit different settings and populations. Additionally, implementation science recognizes that engaging stakeholders throughout the research process is crucial. This includes involving practitioners, patients, and policymakers to ensure implementation is relevant and feasible. Finally, implementation science aims to not only implement interventions but also ensure they are sustained over time, which involves studying the factors that contribute to the long-term success of implementation.
These methodological approaches help bridge the gap between research and practice, ensuring that evidence-based interventions are effectively implemented and sustained in real-world settings.
Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are studying and improving methodologies in implementation science across contexts.
✪ Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): a modified Delphi study
✪ Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): a modified Delphi study
✪ Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision
✪ Mending the gap: Measurement needs to address policy implementation through a health equity lens
Theorizing in implementation science refers to the development and application of theoretical approaches to explain and predict the factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based interventions.
Browse the articles below to see how UW researchers are developing and discussing use of theory in implementation science across contexts.
No post found