Skip to content

Step 3: Identify implementation strategy or strategies

What is an implementation strategy?

Implementation science is fundamentally concerned with identifying effective strategies for implementing evidence-based interventions. Therefore, it is critical to understand the difference in what is meant by implementation strategies and evidence based interventions.

Evidence based interventions are the what that is being implemented. Implementation strategies are how we seek to get evidence based interventions into normal practice in clinical or community settings. This distinction between “what” and “how” is useful for distinguishing implementation strategies from evidence based interventions.

Implementation strategies are the actions taken to enhance adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence based interventions.

Evidence based interventions are programs, practices, principles, procedures, products, pills, or policies that have been demonstrated to improve health behaviors, health outcomes, or health-related environments.

For an in-depth explanation of implementation strategies, read Kirchner and colleagues' excellent introduction in Psychiatry Research (2019).

Grouping implementation strategies

Implementation strategies can target determinants at any level of the social ecological model.

Implementation strategies can be a single strategy (e.g. training), or a bundle of strategies to address multiple implementation barriers (e.g. the use of both reminders and role revisions), or blended strategies that are multiple strategies packaged and branded for use (e.g. the Leadership and Organizational Change Intervention).

In 2015, the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project published a refined compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions compiled by systematically gathering input from stakeholders across implementation science and clinical practice. The resulting table of 73 implementation strategies can be found here or in the original Open Access (✪) article in the journal Implementation Science.

Waltz and colleagues then used concept mapping to characterize relationships among the 73 implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance, resulting in nine clusters of implementation strategies. While not exhaustive, below we provide examples of the different strategies found in each of the nine distinct clusters.
 

The IS Research Pathway

Find Examples

library shelves looking down the aisle

Browse our Library of UW community co-authored publications to see examples of research on a selection of implementation strategies.

Visit the Library

Open Access articles will be marked with ✪
Please note some journals will require subscriptions to access a linked article.

Use Evaluative/Iterative Strategies

  • Assess for readiness, identify barriers/facilitators
  • Audit and provide feedback
  • Purposefully re-examine the implementation
Accessible Accordion

Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators
Audit and provide feedback
Purposefully re-examine the implementation

Engage Consumers

  • Increase demand
  • Use mass media
  • Involve patients/consumers, family members

Utilize financial strategies

  • Alter incentive and/or allowance structures
  • Access new funding
  • Fund and/or contract for the innovation
Accessible Accordion

Alter incentive and/or allowance structures
Access new funding
Fund and/or contract for the innovation

Train and educate stakeholders

  • Conduct ongoing training
  • Distribute educational materials
  • Use train-the-trainer techniques

Provide interactive assistance

  • Facilitation
  • Provide local technical assistance
  • Provide clinical or workplace supervision
Accessible Accordion

Facilitation
Provide local technical assistance
Provide clinical or workplace supervision

Adapted from: ✪ Waltz, TJ., Powell, BJ., Matthieu, MM. et al. Use of concept mapping to .... Implementation Sci 10, 109 (2015) doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0

Adapt and tailor to context

  • Tailor strategies
  • Promote adaptability
  • Use data experts
Accessible Accordion

Tailor strategies
Promote adaptability
Use data experts

Develop stakeholder relationships

  • Identify and prepare champions
  • Organize implementation team meetings
  • Identify early adopters
Accessible Accordion

Identify and prepare champions
Organize implementation team meetings
Identify early adopters

Support Clinicians/Employees

  • Provide reminders
  • Revise professional roles
  • Facilitate relay of data to employees/clinicians
Accessible Accordion

Provide reminders
Revise professional roles
Facilitate relay of data to employees/clinicians

Change infrastructure

  • Mandate change
  • Change record systems
  • Change physical structure and equipment

Strategy Spotlight: SAIA

Developed by Program core faculty Dr. Kenneth Sherr and colleagues, the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach is an evidence-based cascade analysis method that combines system engineering tools into a five-step, facility-level implementation strategy package to give clinic staff and managers a system-wide view of their cascade performance, identify priority areas for improvement, discern modifiable opportunities for improvement, and test workflow modifications.

The process is iterative, which means health care teams can continue to use the package to further improve care and respond to new bottlenecks that arise. Visit www.saia-strategy.com to learn more about this method and about projects currently using SAIA.

SAIA examples

Specifying and Reporting Implementation Strategies for Replicability

Specifying the implementation strategy in your research is crucial for several reasons, and should be clearly delineated in all publications about your research.

It ensures reproducibility, allowing other researchers to replicate your study, which is fundamental for scientific validation. Transparency is another key aspect, as it allows others to understand how you arrived at your conclusions. This level of detail also enhances the credibility of your work, demonstrating that your findings are based on a rigorous and well-documented process. Additionally, it helps reviewers and readers evaluate the validity and reliability of your research. Finally, sharing your strategies contributes to the collective knowledge in your field, positioning it to guide future research and innovations.

Proctor, Powell, and McMillen's stragegy for reporting implementation strategies in a manner that allows for measurement and replication.

Adapted from Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: Recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(139).

Visualizing Implementation Strategy Mechanisms

The study of causal mechanisms in implementation science focuses on understanding how and why specific strategies lead to desired outcomes when implementing evidence-based practices.

Researchers aim to identify the processes or events that drive these outcomes, often referred to as mechanisms of change. This involves developing causal models that link strategies to their effects, considering various factors such as context, barriers, and facilitators. To achieve this, researchers can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to explore and validate these mechanisms.

One of the tools used to understand mechanisms of change are detailed causal pathway diagrams that map out the relationships between strategies and outcomes, including any moderators or preconditions that might influence these relationships. CPDs typically include elements such as implementation strategies, intermediate outcomes, moderators, and final outcomes, providing a clear and structured way to hypothesize and test how and why certain strategies work.

By illuminating these causal pathways, implementation scientists can provide more precise guidance on which strategies are most effective in different contexts. This helps practitioners select and tailor strategies to address specific implementation challenges, ultimately improving the delivery and impact of evidence-based practices. You can learn more about causal pathway diagramming in implementation science at ImpSciMethods.org.

In addition to causal pathway diagrams, several other methods are used to understand mechanisms of change in implementation science:

Logic Models: These are systematic and visual representations of the relationships between resources, activities, outputs, and outcomes. Logic models help in planning, implementing, and evaluating programs by clearly outlining the steps needed to achieve desired outcomes.

Implementation Mapping: This method involves a series of steps to identify and select appropriate implementation strategies. It includes conducting a needs assessment, defining outcomes and performance objectives, choosing theoretical methods, and developing implementation protocols. Implementation mapping ensures that strategies are tailored to the specific context and needs of the target population.

Mechanism Mapping: This approach focuses on identifying and understanding the specific mechanisms through which implementation strategies achieve their effects. It involves linking strategies to their mechanisms of action and evaluating these linkages through empirical research. Mechanism mapping helps in refining and optimizing implementation strategies for better effectiveness (see Kilbourne et al, 2023 for example).

Agile Science: This involves iterative testing and refinement of implementation strategies using rapid-cycle evaluation methods. Agile science emphasizes flexibility and adaptability, allowing researchers to quickly test hypotheses about mechanisms of change and adjust strategies based on real-time data.

These methods collectively enhance the precision and effectiveness of implementation strategies by providing a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of change. By using these tools, implementation scientists can develop more targeted and context-specific strategies, ultimately improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practices. For tools to create CPDs and to learn more about implementation mechanisms, visit ImpSciMethods.org.

Accessible Accordion

If [implementation strategies] are to be scientifically tested, communicated clearly in the literature, and accurately employed in actual healthcare practice, they must be specified both conceptually and operationally.

Proctor, Powell, & McMillen, 2013

Videos from our friends

How to Really Use Implementation Strategies, with Dr. Shari Rogal (University of Pittsburgh DISC)
Implementation Science Strategies, with Dr. Debbie Passey (University of Melbourne Centre for Digital Transformation of Health)

PAUSE AND REFLECT

EQUITY CHECK

Does the selected strategy:

❯ impact the research team’s ability to establish and maintain trust with the communities involved in implementation?

❯ address and dismantle existing power differentials in the project?

❯ position community members to have power in decision-making and to inform implementation adaptations?

❯ consider the social, cultural, economic, and political environments that can influence how implementation strategies are received and applied?

❯ ensure that diverse groups, especially those historically or currently marginalized, are included and their perspectives are legitimized throughout the implementation process?

❯ acknowledge and address possibilities for inequitable application of the strategy?