Barriers and Facilitators Archives - Page 3 of 15

✪ Determinants of implementation of a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a qualitative evaluation

Abstract:

Background

Differentiation of HIV services, a client-centered strategy, may improve care outcomes among adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV). Understanding health provider perceptions of barriers and facilitators that influence implementation can optimize adoption and sustainment of health systems interventions.

Methods

The Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) study was a cluster randomized controlled trial of a stepped care intervention in 24 HIV care facilities in Kenya. At each visit, providers used an assessment tool to allocate AYLHIV to services according to level of need. Stable clients were allocated to differentiated service delivery (DSD) with less frequent visits. Intensified services, including behavioral counseling, were provided for those with greater likelihood of loss to follow-up, mental health issues, or viral non-suppression. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with providers across 12 intervention sites between January-February 2023. FGDs used a semi-structured interview guide, grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, which were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using a team-based rapid turnaround approach to characterize key determinants influencing adoption, reach, and fidelity.

Results

Providers were enthusiastic about, and quick to adopt, the DiSC intervention. They found the DiSC tool easy to use and felt it provided a relative advantage by improving service delivery efficiency and prioritizing time with higher need AYLHIV. Providers noted the importance of tool flexibility to align with changing national guidelines. They expressed concerns about compatibility with existing workflows at facilities exclusively using electronic medical record (EMR) systems, suggesting EMR integration will be needed for intervention sustainment. AYLHIV eligible for DSD benefited from clinic visit intervals that aligned with the school calendar, which posed a challenge for reaching AYLHIV in more intensive steps. Provider collective efficacy was important in consistent implementation of DiSC and was facilitated by continuous quality improvement meetings, access to knowledge and information, and perceived intervention effectiveness. Supportive leadership was an important driver of implementation success, through availing space for mental health counseling sessions and time for client-provider interactions outside standard operating hours.

Conclusions

Consideration of alignment with national policy, integration into clinic workflows, school schedules, and leadership engagement, will be important for sustained use of differentiated care interventions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05007717. Registration date: July 13, 2021.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Advancing implementation of single session interventions in schools: a protocol for a qualitative study

Abstract:

Background

Schools are one of the most common settings in which youth seek mental health services, yet existing school-based mental health interventions are often difficult to implement due to time, cost, and staffing limitations. Digital, self-administered Single Session Interventions (SSIs) are evidence-based supports that are intentionally structured to deliver a clinically-meaningful dosage of evidence-based content within one session. Although multiple studies have demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of school-based SSIs, there have been no systemic efforts to understand how SSIs can be practically implemented in schools. The goal of this project is to partner with students, parents, and school staff to identify factors that impact the implementation of SSIs and understand how SSIs can be sustainably integrated as mental health supports into school mental health infrastructure.

Methods

We will conduct focus groups (five groups, total n = 35–45) among community members (i.e., students, parents/caregivers, teachers, school administrators, and school mental health providers) to assess perceived facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of evidence-based SSIs in schools (Aim 1). We will then work in partnership with community members (n = 10–15) to co-design multi-level implementation strategies (i.e., student-directed, staff-directed, system-directed) for increasing uptake and promoting sustainability of school-based SSIs (Aim 2). We will use inductive coding to thematically analyze qualitative data from group sessions. This study is being conducted within the Lake Washington School District in the Seattle, Washington region.

Discussion

The proposed project will be the first to investigate facilitators and barriers to real-world implementation of SSIs in schools and strategies to improve implementation. Future studies may test the effectiveness of the generated implementation strategies on outcomes such as SSI uptake over time.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Integrating behavioral health care into a low-barrier HIV clinic using the Collaborative Care Model: a mixed methods evaluation of patient care cascade outcomes and determinants

Abstract:

Background

Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers to care, but the walk-in model poses challenges to integrating behavioral health services. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of depression and opioid use disorder in a low-barrier clinic.

Methods

In a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study, we accessed data from patient records to generate a care cascade for the number of patients enrolled in the first six months of the program and conducted individual interviews with patients and staff to interpret the care cascade findings.

Results

Among 175 patients who visited the clinic, 36% were screened for, 24% were referred to, 15% completed an intake for, and 9% engaged in CoCM. The interviews revealed that screening was limited by a lack of clarity among staff about services offered in CoCM, staff forgetting the screening process, and limited time during patent visits. Referrals were limited by low buy-in among staff and patient complexity. Intakes were limited by time and space constraints in the care setting and competing acute patient needs. The care manager’s ability to embody the clinic’s culture facilitated engagement among patients who completed intakes.

Conclusions

Staff perceived CoCM to be acceptable and feasible to implement, but only in the context of multiple barriers to implementation and challenges to systematic screening and measurement-based care.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Contributions to the literature

We evaluated implementation of the Collaborative Care Model, an evidence-based model for integrating behavioral healthcare into primary care settings, for treating depression and opioid-use disorder in a low-barrier HIV clinic. To our knowledge, this is the first implementation of the Collaborative Care Model in a low-barrier HIV clinic.
By specifying a multi-component implementation strategy, our evaluation provides a foundation for selecting and tailoring implementation strategies for use with integrated behavioral healthcare interventions.
Through use of a joint visual display showing a care cascade with illustrative quotes, our evaluation demonstrates a novel approach to using explanatory mixed methods in implementation science.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Formative Evaluation to Inform Implementation of Sepsis Bundles in Emergency Departments

Developing and implementing a process improvement intervention to expand evidence-based psychotherapy in the Department of Defense

Authors:

Jeffrey Cook, Melissa Mistretta, Carmen P. McLean, Jeffrey Mann, Erin Frick, Alan L. Peterson, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Elisa V. Borah, Katherine Anne Comtois, Katherine A. Dondanville, Allison M. Conforte, Jeremy Jinkerson, Zachary K. Jones
81st Medical Group, Keesler Air Force Base, Biloxi, Mississippi, United States
Hana J. Kim, Jared S. Link, Debra Nofziger, Erik N. Ringdahl, John Waggoner, Craig Woodworth, Craig S. Rosen, & David S. Riggs

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Published: April 2025

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Psychological Services

✪ Lessons learnt from the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat dome: a qualitative study of western Washington’s healthcare community response

Abstract:

Objective

The 2021 Pacific Northwest heat dome was Washington state’s deadliest recorded weather event and presented unprecedented response challenges to the state’s health sector. Understanding the impacts of this extreme heat event (EHE) on the sector as well as the barriers to and facilitators of implementing effective heat response is critical to preparing for future events, which are happening more frequently in the region due to climate change.

Design

Guided by an implementation science framework, we convened listening sessions and focus groups of the health sector in western Washington to reflect on regional response efforts.

Setting

Health sector organisations in 15 counties in western Washington State, USA: Clallam, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Lewis, Mason, Pacific, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Thurston and Whatcom.

Participants

A convenience sample of 109 listening group participants was recruited through the professional networks of the Northwest Healthcare Response Network, a regional healthcare coalition. 27 of the health sector professionals were recruited using purposive sampling to participate in seven focus groups organised by organisation type.

Results

The co-presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, limited staff capacity, resource acquisition challenges and inadequate regional collaboration emerged as key barriers, while advanced planning, indoor cooling capabilities, adapting strategies to local needs, robust internal relationships and strong external partnerships were reported to facilitate effective response. Establishing centralised coordination ahead of heat events, making improvements to the cooling capabilities of the built environment, developing plans and policies for EHEs that have co-benefits for other events, adopting evidence-informed response strategies, institutionalising the knowledge and relationships developed through prior events and improving evaluative processes (such as developing real-time monitoring capacity) will enable more effective response to future EHEs.

Conclusions

Western Washington’s health sector implemented EHE response activities that enabled essential service continuity, despite limited resources, unfamiliarity with EHEs and other systemic challenges. The recency of the heat dome presents an opportunity to incorporate lessons learnt into practice, policies, plans and built environment; these are necessary improvements ahead of future large-scale events the region may experience in the coming decades.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Strengthening the US Health Workforce to End the HIV Epidemic: Lessons Learned From 11 Ending the HIV Epidemic Jurisdictions

Authors:

Phillip L Marotta, Debbie Humphries, Daniel Escudero, David A Katz, Joseph G Rosen, Samantha Veronica Hill, Jennifer L Glick, Dennis H Li, Latosha Elopre, Fatemeh Ghadimi, Rinad S Beidas, Jose Bauermeister, Stephen Bonett, Drew B Cameron, LaRon E Nelson, Serena Rajabiun, Larry R Hearld, Mansoorah Kermani, Sarah Stoltman, Darjai Payne, Tobeya Ibitayo, Faiad Alam, Amanda Williams, Corilyn Ott, Emma Kay, Sarah Chrestman, Scott Batey, Laramie R Smith, Robin Gaines Lanzi, Karen Musgrove, Mayra Malagon, Jeannette Bailey-Webb, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Gregory Gross, Taylor Kaser, Tawnya Brown, Chelsey R Carter, Michael Mugavero , Tequetta Valeriano, Sarah Shaw, Anjuli D Wagner, Bakari Atiba, & Russell A Brewer

^{University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.}

✪ Open Access

Published: April 2025

Read the full text open access in the journal JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

✪ School-Partnered Collaborative Care (SPACE) for Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Usability Study of a Virtual Intervention With Multisystem Community Partners

Abstract:

Background

School-partnered interventions may improve health outcomes for children with type 1 diabetes, though there is limited evidence to support their effectiveness and sustainability. Family, school, or health system factors may interfere with intervention usability and implementation.

Objective

To identify and address potential implementation barriers during intervention development, we combined methods in user-centered design and implementation science to adapt an evidence-based psychosocial intervention, the collaborative care model, to a virtual school-partnered collaborative care (SPACE) model for type 1 diabetes between schools and diabetes medical teams.

Methods

We recruited patient, family, school, and health system partners (n=20) to cocreate SPACE through iterative, web-based design sessions using a digital whiteboard (phase 1). User-centered design methods included independent and group activities for idea generation, visual voting, and structured critique of the evolving SPACE prototype. In phase 2, the prototype was evaluated with the usability evaluation for evidence-based psychosocial interventions methods. School nurses reviewed the prototype and tasks in cognitive walkthroughs and completed the Intervention Usability Scale (IUS). Two members of the research team independently identified and prioritized (1-3 rating) discrete usability concerns. We evaluated the relationship between prioritization and the percentage of nurses reporting each usability issue with Spearman correlation. Differences in IUS scores by school nurse characteristics were assessed with ANOVA.

Results

In the design phase, the partners generated over 90 unique ideas for SPACE, prioritizing elements pertaining to intervention adaptability, team-based communication, and multidimensional outcome tracking. Following three iterations of prototype development, cognitive walkthroughs were completed with 10 school nurses (n=10, 100% female; mean age 48.5, SD 9.5 years) representing different districts and years of experience. Nurses identified 16 discrete usability issues (each reported by 10%-60% of participants). Two issues receiving the highest priority (3.0): ability to access a virtual platform (n=3, 30% of participants) and data-sharing mechanisms between nurses and providers (n=6, 60% of participants). There was a moderate correlation between priority rating and the percentage of nurses reporting each issue (ρ=0.63; P=.01). Average IUS ratings (77.8, SD 11.1; 100-point scale) indicated appropriate usability. There was no difference in IUS ratings by school nurse experience (P=.54), student caseload (P=.12), number of schools covered (P=.90), or prior experience with type 1 diabetes (P=.83), suggesting that other factors may influence usability. The design team recommended strategies for SPACE implementation to overcome high-priority issues, including training users on videoconferencing applications, establishing secure forms for school data reporting, and sharing glucose data in real-time during SPACE meetings.

Conclusions

Cross-sector interventions are complex, and perceived usability is a potential barrier to implementation. Using web-based cocreation methods with community partners promoted high-quality intervention design that is aligned with end-user priorities. Quantitative and qualitative assessments indicated appropriate degree of usability to move forward with pilot-testing.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Practical considerations for engaging staff in resource-constrained healthcare settings in implementation research: A qualitative focus group and consensus building study

Abstract:

Background

The primary purpose of this study was to assess perceived burdens and benefits of participating in implementation research among staff employed in resource-constrained healthcare settings. Another objective was to use findings to generate considerations for engaging staff in research across different phases of implementation research.

Methods

This qualitative focus group and consensus building study involved researchers affiliated with the National Cancer Institute Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control program and nine Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Massachusetts. Six focus groups (n = 3 with CHC staff; n = 3 with researchers) assessed barriers and facilitators to staff participation in implementation research. During consensus discussions, we used findings to develop considerations for engaging staff as participants and partners throughout phases of implementation research.

Results

Sixteen researchers and 14 staff participated in separate focus groups; nine researchers and seven staff participated in separate consensus discussions. Themes emerged across participant groups in three domains: (1) influences on research participation; (2) research burdens and benefits; and (3) ways to facilitate staff participation in research. Practical considerations included: (a) aligning research with organizational and staff values and priorities; (b) applying user-centered design to research methods; (c) building organizational and individual research capacity; and (d) offering equitable incentives for staff participation.

Conclusions

Engaging staff as participants and partners across different phases of implementation research requires knowledge about what contributes to research burden and benefits and addressing context-specific burdens and benefits.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

✪ Factors influencing community demand for assisted partner services for HIV in western Kenya: a multilevel qualitative analysis

Abstract:

Objectives

This study explores factors affecting community-level demand for assisted partner services (APS) and HIV testing services (HTS) in western Kenya.

Design

This is a multilevel qualitative analysis conducted as part of the APS Scale-up Study, a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study of APS integrated within routine HTS. For this analysis, in-depth phone interviews assessed demand for APS and factors influencing decisions to participate in APS.

Setting

Participants were recruited from eight healthcare facilities and (for APS stakeholders) from affiliated healthcare institutions in western Kenya (Kisumu and Homabay). Interviews were conducted by phone in 2019 and 2020.

Participants

67 participants were interviewed: 14 APS providers, 16 female index clients, 17 male sexual partners and 20 community members. Participants were recruited using criteria-based purposive sampling to represent different types of facilities and to include indexes who named different numbers of partners and stakeholders representing all Kenyan healthcare system levels.

Results

Collectively, participants perceived that demand and uptake of APS could be impacted by multiple stigmas related to HIV, sexual behaviours and identities; long clinical wait times; certain gender norms and expectations; and fear of relationship dissolution, loss of financial support and intimate partner violence. However, different stakeholder groups generally focused on different factors; women focused more on gender dynamics and family roles; male sexual partners on stigma and structural barriers; HTS providers focused on HIV testing accessibility; and community-level stakeholders focused on low community awareness of APS.

Conclusions

Stigma reduction, awareness about APS, creation of male entry points at the facility level and provision of social support mechanisms have the potential to increase demand for APS.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available because some interview transcripts may contain sensitive individual information; however, they can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

^{**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**}

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMC Health Service Research

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Discussion

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science Communications

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Contributions to the literature

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Annals of Emergency Medicine

Authors:

Subscription Required for Full Text Access

Read the full text in the subscription access journal Psychological Services

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMJ Open

Abstract:

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the journal JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal JMIR Diabetes

Abstract:

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text open access in the Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract:

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Authors:

✪ Open Access

Read the full text in the open access journal BMJ Open

Abstract:

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Results

Conclusions

Data availability statement