Authors:
Kristoffer Pettersson, Philip Millroth, Fabrizia Giannotta, Pernilla Liedgren, Aaron R. Lyon, Henna Hasson, and Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
University of Washington affiliated authors are displayed in bold.
✪ Open Access
Published: February 2025
Read the full text in the open access journal Implementation Science
Abstract:
Background
Implementing evidence-based parenting programs often involves navigating fidelity-adaptation decisions. While research has explored various aspects of this dilemma, little is known about how practitioners’ outcome preferences influence their decisions in real-world scenarios.
Methods
This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate the relative importance of five outcomes (Relationship Quality, Satisfaction, Workload Strain, Value Conflict, and Reach) in fidelity-adaptation decisions among 209 practitioners delivering evidence-based parenting programs in Sweden. The DCE presented 25 choice sets across five contextual scenarios, analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression.
Results
All five outcomes significantly influenced practitioners’ choices, with Relationship Quality emerging as the most impactful (log-odds: 4.56, 95% CI [4.16, 4.91]). Satisfaction and minimizing Value Conflict showed similar importance (log odds: 2.45 and -2.40, respectively), while Workload Strain and Reach had slightly less impact (log odds: -2.10 and 1.96, respectively).
Conclusions
This study offers a novel perspective on the role of outcome preference in navigating fidelity-adaptation decisions. The strong preference for improving parent-child relationships aligns with core parenting program goals, while consideration of other outcomes reflects practitioners’ holistic approach to implementation. These findings can inform the design of interventions and implementation strategies that balance effectiveness with real-world constraints, potentially enhancing parenting programs’ adoption, sustainability, and impact.
Contributions to the literature
- This study pioneers the application of discrete choice experiments in exploring fidelity-adaptation decisions.
- Quantifying practitioners’ outcome preferences provides empirical evidence of complex trade-offs in implementing evidence-based parenting programs.
- The study’s results provide actionable insights for program developers, policymakers, and implementation scientists on designing interventions that resonate with practitioners’ priorities while maintaining program effectiveness.
- This research bridges theoretical frameworks and real-world decision-making, advancing our understanding of how various factors influence intervention delivery in practice.
**This abstract is posted with permission under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License**